Moderate evidence
More
Review of 11 studies shows nursing students' AI literacy is moderate
Study title: Levels of Artificial Intelligence Literacy Among Nursing Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Evidence type
- Systematic review or meta-analysis
- Sources
- 1 sourcePeer-reviewed
- Published
- 1 min read
- Truvace record
- TRV-2026-2787cite or check it
Study title: Levels of Artificial Intelligence Literacy Among Nursing Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
A systematic review and meta-analysis pooled 11 studies of nursing students' AI literacy. The combined mean score was 4.80, with a 95% confidence interval of 4.41 to 5.19, which the authors describe as a moderate level.
Read the study abstract
BACKGROUND: The growing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into nursing education makes AI literacy a critical competency for students to effectively use AI and advance educational practices. PURPOSE: In this study, we aimed to assess nursing students' AI literacy and to examine the influence of year of study and AI training on their literacy levels. METHODS: We searched 10 databases from inception to February 23, 2026. A random-effects model was used to pool overall AI literacy scores, with subgroup an…
The problem
A meta-analysis of 11 studies found nursing students' AI literacy was moderate, with a pooled mean score of 4.80, and lower among first-year students and those without prior AI training.
In brief
Scores were lower among first-year students and among students who had no prior AI training. The authors conclude that literacy needs improvement in these groups and recommend targeted, tiered training from educators.
The review searched 10 databases from inception to February 23, 2026, and was published in Nurse Educator in May 2026.
Main points
- The meta-analysis included 11 studies of nursing students' AI literacy.
- The pooled mean AI literacy score was 4.80 (95% confidence interval: 4.41 to 5.19).
- Subgroup analyses found lower scores among first-year students.
- Students without prior AI training also scored lower.
- The authors recommend that educators use targeted, tiered AI training.
What the review found when it combined the studies
These are the review’s own pooled results, copied from its abstract. Truvace did not recalculate them.
AI literacy score among nursing students
Pooled mean score 4.80 (95% CI 4.41 to 5.19)
11 studies · search to February 23, 2026
The review’s own words
The pooled mean AI literacy score was 4.80 (95% confidence interval: 4.41, 5.19).
Code checks every number above against the review’s text before it is shown. The short labels are an AI model’s reading of that text, so the review’s own sentence sits under each one. A pooled figure is only as strong as the studies behind it. How Truvace uses pooled results
The full story
Researchers searched 10 databases from their inception to February 23, 2026, and pooled overall AI literacy scores from 11 studies using a random-effects model. They ran subgroup analyses to explore sources of heterogeneity between studies.
The pooled mean score of 4.80 was characterised as moderate. The authors aimed to test how year of study and AI training affect literacy, and both factors were linked to differences: first-year students and those without prior training scored lower.
Based on these results, the authors say educators should implement targeted, tiered training, aimed particularly at first-year students and those who have not previously been trained in AI.
Sources
1 on file- Nurse Educatordoi:10.1097/nne.0000000000002175
Talk it over
Who carries this cost, and what would have to change to prevent it?
Review of 11 studies shows nursing students' AI literacy is moderatehttps://truvace.com/item/levels-of-artificial-intelligence-literacy-among-nursing-students-a-systematic-r
Who carries this cost, and what would have to change to prevent it?
The problem A meta-analysis of 11 studies found nursing students' AI literacy was moderate, with a pooled mean score of 4.80, and lower among first-year students and those without prior AI training.
Answer in the threadHow do we know? What can this kind of evidence show, and what can’t it?
The evidence This rests on a systematic review or meta-analysis, from Nurse Educator.
Answer in the threadWhat does it leave open? What else would you want to know before acting on it?
Answer in the threadHave you seen AI used this way where you study, work or live? Did it go the same way?
Answer in the thread
The questions are the same on every record. The details under them are taken from this record as written.
ace
What readers say