70/100

Moderate evidence

Meta-analysis of 32 studies finds chatbots lift learning outcomes, with gaps in critical thinking

Study title: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Effect of Chatbot Technology Use in Sustainable Education

Evidence type
Systematic review or meta-analysis
Sample
n = 2,201
Sources
1 sourcePeer-reviewed
Published
1 min read

Study title: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Effect of Chatbot Technology Use in Sustainable Education

A meta-analysis pooled 32 empirical studies covering 2,201 participants, published between 2010 and 2022, to test how chatbot-assisted learning affects students. It found a medium-to-high effect on overall learning outcomes.

Read the study abstract

The development of artificial intelligence in recent years has promoted the use of chatbot technology in sustainable education. Many studies examined the effect of chatbots on learning outcomes. However, scant studies summarized the effectiveness of chatbots in education. The aim of the study is to investigate the effect of chatbot-assisted learning on various components and how different moderator variables influenced the effectiveness. This study, through a meta-analysis, reviewed 32 empirical studies with 220…

The gain

A meta-analysis of 32 studies with 2,201 participants found chatbot-assisted learning had a medium-to-high effect on overall learning outcomes, including explicit reasoning, learning achievement, knowledge retention and learning interest.

In brief

The effect held regardless of intervention duration, the role the chatbot played and the learning content. Chatbots significantly improved explicit reasoning, learning achievement, knowledge retention and learning interest.

Results were not uniformly positive: the analysis reported negative findings for critical thinking, learning engagement and motivation. The authors suggest future research should cover a wider range of learning components.

Main points

  1. The meta-analysis reviewed 32 empirical studies with 2,201 participants published from 2010 to 2022.
  2. Chatbot use had a medium-to-high effect on overall learning outcomes.
  3. The effect did not depend on intervention duration, chatbot role or learning content.
  4. Explicit reasoning, learning achievement, knowledge retention and learning interest improved significantly.
  5. Critical thinking, learning engagement and motivation showed negative findings.

The full story

The authors say many studies have examined chatbots and learning, but few had summarised their effectiveness. They set out to test the effect of chatbot-assisted learning on different learning components and whether moderator variables changed it.

Moderators tested were intervention duration, chatbot roles and learning content. The medium-to-high overall effect held regardless of these variables.

By component, gains appeared in explicit reasoning, learning achievement, knowledge retention and learning interest, while critical thinking, learning engagement and motivation showed negative findings. The authors call for future research to include different learning components.

Sources

1 on file
  1. Sustainabilitydoi:10.3390/su15042940
    Peer-reviewed2023-02-06

Talk it over

Four questions to start on
Who gets this benefit, and who was left out of the study or story?

Start with a question

Meta-analysis of 32 studies finds chatbots lift learning outcomes, with gaps in critical thinkinghttps://truvace.com/item/a-meta-analysis-and-systematic-review-of-the-effect-of-chatbot-technology-use-in

  1. Who gets this benefit, and who was left out of the study or story?

    The gain A meta-analysis of 32 studies with 2,201 participants found chatbot-assisted learning had a medium-to-high effect on overall learning outcomes, including explicit reasoning, learning achievement, knowledge retention and learning interest.

    Answer in the thread
  2. How do we know? What can this kind of evidence show, and what can’t it?

    The evidence This rests on a systematic review or meta-analysis with a sample of 2,201, from Sustainability.

    Answer in the thread
  3. What does it leave open? What else would you want to know before acting on it?

    Answer in the thread
  4. Have you seen AI used this way where you study, work or live? Did it go the same way?

    Answer in the thread

The questions are the same on every record. The details under them are taken from this record as written.

What readers say