Truace
Subscribe
70/100

Moderate evidence

ProblemPublished recordEducationProblem Space

Full story
More
Export record JSONEmailLinkedInX

Levels of Artificial Intelligence Literacy Among Nursing Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Truvace record
TRV-2026-2787raw data (JSON)
Version
v1Published
First published
Evidence type
Systematic review or meta-analysis
Sources
1 sourcePeer-reviewed
sha256
90d56034032e…check it

BACKGROUND: The growing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into nursing education makes AI literacy a critical competency for students to effectively use AI and advance educational practices. PURPOSE: In this study, we aimed to assess nursing students' AI literacy and to examine the influence of year of study and AI training on their literacy levels. METHODS: We searched 10 databases from inception to February 23, 2026. A random-effects model was used to pool overall AI literacy scores, with subgroup an…

The problem

A meta-analysis of 11 studies found nursing students' AI literacy was moderate, with a pooled mean score of 4.80, and lower among first-year students and those without prior AI training.

Sources

1 on file
  1. Nurse Educatordoi:10.1097/nne.0000000000002175
    Peer-reviewed2026-05-13

What the review found when it combined the studies

These are the review’s own pooled results, copied from its abstract. Truvace did not recalculate them.

  • AI literacy score among nursing students

    Pooled mean score 4.80 (95% CI 4.41 to 5.19)

    11 studies · search to February 23, 2026

    The review’s own words
    The pooled mean AI literacy score was 4.80 (95% confidence interval: 4.41, 5.19).

Code checks every number above against the review’s text before it is shown. The short labels are an AI model’s reading of that text, so the review’s own sentence sits under each one. A pooled figure is only as strong as the studies behind it. How Truvace uses pooled results

Cite this record

v1

Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-2787, v1: “Levels of Artificial Intelligence Literacy Among Nursing Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Truvace, 2026-11-12. /record/TRV-2026-2787 (accessed on the day you copy it). sha256 90d56034032e7dcd…

Change history

1 version

Every change made to this record since it was first published, and why. Nothing has changed since it went up.

  1. Publishedv190d56034032e…

    Certified into the record

Check this record hasn’t been altered

Check this record hasn’t been altered
How to check it yourself, without trusting this page

Download any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-2787 and hash its canonical field yourself, for example with shasum -a 256. You should get its content_hash. Each version’s text also ends with prev:and the hash of the version before it (version 1 points to 64 zeros). If anyone had changed a single character of any version after it was saved, those hashes wouldn’t line up.