AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations
This article reports the findings of AI4People, an Atomium-EISMD initiative designed to lay the foundations for a "Good AI Society". We introduce the core opportunities and risks of AI for society; present a synthesis of five ethical principles that should undergird its development and adoption; and offer 20 concrete recommendations-to assess, to develop, to incentivise, and to support good AI-which in some cases may be undertaken directly by national or supranational policy makers, while in others may be led by…

"Technical Session 2: Architecture of AGI Systems" by brewbooks is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/.
This article reports the findings of AI4People, an Atomium-EISMD initiative designed to lay the foundations for a "Good AI Society". We introduce the core opportunities and risks of AI for society; present a synthesis of five ethical principles that should undergird its development and adoption; and offer 20 concrete recommendations-to assess, to develop, to incentivise, and to support good AI-which in some cases may be undertaken directly by national or supranational policy makers, while in others may be led by other stakeholders.
If adopted, these recommendations would serve as a firm foundation for the establishment of a Good AI Society.
- This article reports the findings of AI4People, an Atomium-EISMD initiative designed to lay the foundations for a "Good AI Society".
- If adopted, these recommendations would serve as a firm foundation for the establishment of a Good AI Society.
We introduce the core opportunities and risks of AI for society; present a synthesis of five ethical principles that should undergird its development and adoption; and offer 20 concrete recommendations-to assess, to develop, to incentivise, and to support good AI-which in some cases may be undertaken directly by national or supranational policy makers, while in others may be led by other stakeholders.
Sources
- Peer-reviewedMinds and Machines2018-11-25
The debate