Assessment & Integrity
3 gains2 Traces7 problems
Every measured gain and problem on the record for this topic, newest first.Too few to weigh yet. Updated .
One square per record, darker for stronger evidence:Evidence: 0 high7 moderate5 emerging
12 records so far, too few to weigh yet. Is your study missing? Add it
AI, assessment and academic integrity
A Trace is one record with both a gain and a problem, so it counts on both sides: 5 records show a gain and 9 show a problem. 11 context records are in the record list but not counted, because they report no measured gain or problem.
| Evidence | Gain side | Problem side |
|---|---|---|
| HighStrong study design, backed by at least two independent sources | 0 | 0 |
| ModerateA measured study or an official source | 4 | 5 |
| EmergingEarly, small, unreviewed or reported second-hand | 1 | 4 |
By type of evidence: 2 interview studies; 2 benchmark or lab tests; 2 commentaries or narrative reviews; 2 controlled comparisons; 2 surveys; 2 news reports. How evidence is scored
12 records so far, too few to weigh yet. A written summary appears once a topic has at least 20 counted records, with at least 5 on each side. Is your study missing? Add it
In a study comparing AI and expert scoring, agreement on one checklist item rose from 0.56 to 0.89 after prompt tuning, and 7 of 11 items reached good or very good agreement (AC1 of 0.71 or higher).
In a study of 35 pre-university students, participants reported significantly lower anxiety in AIvaluate-mediated assessments than in face-to-face ones, and rated the system's usability as good.
On 902 medical student answers, Claude Sonnet 4 matched the human majority score closely (QWK 0.88-0.90), against 0.90-0.92 agreement among the human graders themselves.
Students surveyed in 109 countries said ChatGPT promotes cheating and plagiarism, is less reliable for classroom learning and is less useful for building critical thinking and decision-making skills.
A review of 213 journal articles from 2015 to 2025 found African contributions on AI, ethics and integrity in universities remained limited, while the United States, China and the United Kingdom led output.
In a survey of 781 Taiwanese university students, those in the Narc-Psych-Sad personality profile reported cheating with generative AI more often than those in the Machiavellian profile.
23 records · page 2 of 2
Published January 9 2025 in the British Journal of Biomedical Science, this peer-reviewed review examines how generative AI is being integrated into higher education, noting opportunities for personalised learning and innovative assessment alongside challenges to integrity and equity.
British Journal of Biomedical Science
In early 2024, researchers surveyed 23,218 higher education students in 109 countries and territories about ChatGPT. Students reported using it mainly for brainstorming, summarizing texts, and finding research articles,…
The peer-reviewed commentary from April 2024 analyzes the rapid uptake of generative AI chatbots like ChatGPT in universities, noting both potential to enhance teaching, research, administration and student support and…
The paper proposes the EAP-AIAS, an adaptation of the AI Assessment Scale tailored to English for Academic Purposes, outlining five levels of permitted GenAI use from No AI to Full AI to guide learning and assessment…
This March 2026 systematic and thematic review examined generative AI tools such as ChatGPT in higher education, analyzing 46 Web of Science documents and qualitatively synthesizing 27 peer-reviewed…
On 24 September 2025 The Guardian published three letters responding to warnings about AI in universities. Contributors from Leeds, Hosei, and Nottingham debated whether large language models should…
Researchers compared traditional face-to-face performance-based assessments with sessions mediated by AIvaluate, an LLM-augmented emotionally intelligent conversational agent, using 35 pre-university…
In early 2026 KPMG Australia reported that over two dozen employees, including a partner fined A$10,000, had been caught using AI tools to cheat on internal exams since July 2025, with the cheating…
ace