Certified into the record
The exact text we saved
This is the version exactly as it was saved, character for character. The SHA-256 hash below is a 64-character code worked out from that text. Run the same text through SHA-256 and you get the same code; change a single letter and the code comes out completely different. Each version also stores the previous version’s hash, which chains them together so no version can be swapped out quietly.
TRUVACE RECORD VERSION record: TRV-2026-2765 version: 1 kind: certified reason: Certified into the record timestamp: 2026-11-12T17:20:44.877923Z status: published lens: g_space sector: education headline: Effectiveness and implications of chatbot-supported language learning: a meta-analysis of global studies dek: The use of chatbots has recently received considerable attention in educational research. In particular, an increasing number of studies have adopted chatbots in language learning. However, reviews examining the effects of using chatbots in language learning are scarce. Thus, this meta-analysis attempted to synthesise the available research findings on the effectiveness of using chatbots in language learning. It included 29 empirical studies. A random effects meta-analysis indicated that chatbot-supported interv… gain_title: A meta-analysis of 29 empirical studies found chatbot-supported interventions produced a medium overall effect on language learning (g = 0.795), though results varied significantly between studies. problem_title: (none) trace_subject: (none) gain_reading: A meta-analysis of 29 empirical studies found chatbot-supported interventions produced a medium overall effect on language learning (g = 0.795), though results varied significantly between studies. gain_evidence: chatbots yielded a medium overall effect size on language learning (g = 0.795) | chatbot-supported interventions enhanced language learning problem_reading: (none) problem_evidence: (none) quick_read: A meta-analysis pooled 29 empirical studies on chatbots in language learning and found that chatbot-supported interventions improved learning outcomes. The overall effect size was medium (g = 0.795) in a random effects model. The authors say reviews of chatbot effects in language learning had been scarce even as more studies adopted chatbots. Results differed significantly across studies, so the average effect does not apply equally to every classroom or tool. limitation: The authors report significant heterogeneity across the included studies, so the average effect varies widely between settings and designs. tag: Evidence-backed gain key_points: The meta-analysis included 29 empirical studies of chatbots used in language learning. | A random effects model gave an overall effect size of g = 0.795, described as medium. | The authors found significant heterogeneity across the included studies. | Eight moderator variables were examined: educational level, chatbot design principles, devices, modalities, language knowledge and skills, intervention duration, intervention setting and control conditions. | The authors also discuss implications for language teaching and for future research. rundown: The review set out to fill a gap: although a growing number of studies have put chatbots into language learning, syntheses of their effects were scarce. It pooled 29 empirical studies using a random effects meta-analysis. Chatbot-supported interventions enhanced language learning overall, with a medium effect size of g = 0.795. Heterogeneity across studies was significant. To explain the variation, the authors examined eight potential moderators, including educational level, chatbot design principles, devices, modalities, the language skills targeted, how long interventions ran, where they took place and what control conditions were used. sources: - peer_reviewed | Interactive Learning Environments | https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2598061 | 2025-12-15 prev: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
- SHA-256 hash
- 93390f78db5cf2c5b9a926a9f76a97291f6a1a0e65b9bb1c28e1dd9563e6299f
- Previous version’s hash
- 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
How to check it yourself, without trusting this page
Download any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-2765 and hash its canonical field yourself, for example with shasum -a 256. You should get its content_hash. Each version’s text also ends with prev:and the hash of the version before it (version 1 points to 64 zeros). If anyone had changed a single character of any version after it was saved, those hashes wouldn’t line up.
ace