70/100

Moderate evidence

GainPublished recordEducationGood Space

Effectiveness and implications of chatbot-supported language learning: a meta-analysis of global studies

Truvace record
TRV-2026-2765raw data (JSON)
Version
v1Published
First published
Evidence type
Systematic review or meta-analysis
Sources
1 sourcePeer-reviewed
sha256
93390f78db5c…check it

The use of chatbots has recently received considerable attention in educational research. In particular, an increasing number of studies have adopted chatbots in language learning. However, reviews examining the effects of using chatbots in language learning are scarce. Thus, this meta-analysis attempted to synthesise the available research findings on the effectiveness of using chatbots in language learning. It included 29 empirical studies. A random effects meta-analysis indicated that chatbot-supported interv…

The gain

A meta-analysis of 29 empirical studies found chatbot-supported interventions produced a medium overall effect on language learning (g = 0.795), though results varied significantly between studies.

What this doesn’t fix

The authors report significant heterogeneity across the included studies, so the average effect varies widely between settings and designs.

Sources

1 on file
  1. Interactive Learning Environmentsdoi:10.1080/10494820.2025.2598061
    Peer-reviewed2025-12-15

Cite this record

v1

Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-2765, v1: “Effectiveness and implications of chatbot-supported language learning: a meta-analysis of global studies.” Truvace, 2026-11-12. /record/TRV-2026-2765 (accessed on the day you copy it). sha256 93390f78db5cf2c5…

Change history

1 version

Every change made to this record since it was first published, and why. Nothing has changed since it went up.

  1. Publishedv193390f78db5c…

    Certified into the record

Check this record hasn’t been altered

Check this record hasn’t been altered
How to check it yourself, without trusting this page

Download any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-2765 and hash its canonical field yourself, for example with shasum -a 256. You should get its content_hash. Each version’s text also ends with prev:and the hash of the version before it (version 1 points to 64 zeros). If anyone had changed a single character of any version after it was saved, those hashes wouldn’t line up.