TRV-2026-0133Version 1 · Certified
Reason for this version
Certified into the record
Canonical text (the exact bytes fingerprinted)
TRUVACE RECORD VERSION record: TRV-2026-0133 version: 1 kind: certified reason: Certified into the record timestamp: 2026-07-13T08:33:17.160079Z status: published lens: p_space sector: crime headline: Beyond Generative Intelligence: A Comprehensive Review of Emerging Artificial Intelligence Paradigms, Explainability Challenges, Ethical Risks, and Future Directions dek: The artificial intelligence landscape has undergone a profound transformation from narrow, task-specific automation to sophisticated, multi-paradigm systems capable of autonomous reasoning, emotional understanding, and creative generation. This systematic literature review synthesizes 141 peer-reviewed studies published between 2018 and 2026 to map the evolution of AI paradigms beyond the dominant Generative AI breakthrough. Following PRISMA guidelines, we analyzed 4,250 initial records across six major academic… gain_title: (none) problem_title: AI systems exhibit a persistent black box problem that blocks trust and adoption in high-stakes domains including healthcare, finance, and criminal justice, while dark AI uses like deepfakes and AI-powered cyberattacks create governance risks. trace_subject: (none) gain_reading: (none) gain_evidence: (none) problem_reading: AI systems exhibit a persistent black box problem that blocks trust and adoption in high-stakes domains including healthcare, finance, and criminal justice, while dark AI uses like deepfakes and AI-powered cyberattacks create governance risks. problem_evidence: The Black Box problem remains a fundamental barrier to trust in high-stakes domains such as healthcare, finance, and criminal justice | Dark AI threats—encompassing deepfakes, AI-powered cyberattacks, autonomous weapons, and surveillance systems—pose unprecedented risks quick_read: By July 2026, this systematic review synthesized 141 studies to map seven emerging paradigms beyond generative AI, including Emotional and Empathetic AI, Social AI, Agentic AI, Multimodal AI, Explainable AI, and Responsible AI, documenting a shift from purely technical research to socio-technical integration. The persistence of the black box problem matters because it limits trust and deployment in healthcare, finance, and criminal justice despite SHAP, LIME, and attention visualization, while dark AI threats increase pressure for international governance; uncertainty remains because the proposed six-layer ecosystem framework is conceptual and lacks stakeholder validation and empirical testing. limitation: The proposed Integrated AI Ecosystem Framework remains conceptual and has not undergone empirical validation, which the authors identify as a future research priority. tag: Evidence-backed problem key_points: Systematic review of 141 peer-reviewed studies from 2018 to 2026 following PRISMA guidelines from 4,250 initial records | Bibliometric analysis identified five thematic clusters: Intelligence and Learning, Generative Ecosystems, Human-Centric AI, Governance and Trust, and Autonomous Systems | XAI techniques cited include SHAP, LIME, and attention visualization as partial responses to explainability challenges rundown: The review screened 4,250 records across six major academic databases and included 141 studies, using a modified Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool with ICC = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.83-0.91, and a three-phase thematic synthesis yielding 47 first-order codes and 18 second-order themes. Authors propose an Integrated AI Ecosystem Framework with six interdependent layers: Intelligence, Creation, Human Interaction, Autonomous, Governance, and Security, with Trustworthy AI as integrating principle, positioned against EU High-Level Expert Group Trustworthy AI, NIST AI Risk Management Framework, and IEEE Ethically Aligned Design. sources: - peer_reviewed | International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering Management & Applied Science | https://doi.org/10.51583/ijltemas.2026.150600099 | 2026-07-11 prev: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
- sha256
- 9d2cef76957710f9cfdffe4ecfa6a2c0196e0ef5a7e6d681888e8b5ae9f199ca
- previous
- 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page
Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-0133 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.
ace