70/100

Moderate evidence

Review of 45 studies finds AI's downsides hurt customer trust and sales

Study title: The dark side of artificial intelligence in marketing: meta-analytics review

Evidence type
Systematic review or meta-analysis
Sample
n = 19,503
Sources
1 sourcePeer-reviewed
Published
2 min read

Study title: The dark side of artificial intelligence in marketing: meta-analytics review

A meta-analysis pooled effect sizes from 45 studies covering 50 independent samples and 19,503 people to measure how AI's negative aspects shape customer responses in marketing. Privacy concern, perceived risks, customer alienation and uniqueness neglect each had a negative and significant effect.

Read the study abstract

Purpose Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a pivotal technology in both marketing and daily life. Despite extensive research on the benefits of AI, its adverse effects on customers have received limited attention. Design/methodology/approach We employed meta-analysis to synthesise effect sizes from 45 studies encompassing 50 independent samples (N = 19,503) to illuminate the negative facets of AI's impact on customer responses. Findings Adverse effects of AI, including privacy concern, perceived risks, cust…

The dark side of artificial intelligence in marketing: meta-analytics review
"King's Observatory, Kew, the observatory dome with telescope" by AndyScott, CC0.

The problem

A meta-analysis of 45 studies (N = 19,503) found that privacy concern, perceived risk, customer alienation and uniqueness neglect from AI had significant negative effects on customers' trust, satisfaction, purchasing, loyalty and well-being.

In brief

The harms reached customers' thinking (perceived benefit, trust), feelings (attitude, satisfaction) and behaviour (purchase, loyalty, well-being). The authors describe the work as among the first to synthesise research on the dark side of AI in marketing.

The size of the effects varied with context: whether AI was online or offline, customer age and gender, product type, firm type and national culture all moderated the relationships. The authors say marketing managers should weigh these drawbacks and policymakers should consider vulnerable groups.

Main points

  1. The meta-analysis combined 45 studies with 50 independent samples and 19,503 participants.
  2. Four adverse AI factors were examined: privacy concern, perceived risks, customer alienation and uniqueness neglect.
  3. Each had a significant negative effect on perceived benefit and trust.
  4. Attitude and satisfaction also fell, and purchase, loyalty and well-being were also affected.
  5. Effects differed by online versus offline AI, customer age and gender, hedonic versus utilitarian products, and high versus low involvement.
  6. Service versus manufacturing firms, and national traits such as individualism, power distance, masculinity, uncertainty avoidance and long-term orientation, also moderated the effects.

The full story

The researchers synthesised effect sizes from earlier studies rather than running a new experiment. The pool covered 45 studies and 50 independent samples with 19,503 participants in total, aimed at the negative side of AI that they say has had limited attention compared with its benefits.

Adverse effects were grouped as privacy concern, perceived risks, customer alienation and uniqueness neglect. These lowered customers' cognitive responses (perceived benefit, trust), affective responses (attitude, satisfaction) and behavioural responses (purchase, loyalty, well-being).

Moderators shaped the strength of these effects, including AI setting (online or offline), customer age and gender, product type, level of involvement, firm sector and national cultural dimensions. The authors recommend that managers find ways to minimise these effects in different contexts and that policymakers pay attention to vulnerable groups.

Sources

1 on file
  1. Marketing Intelligence & Planningdoi:10.1108/mip-09-2023-0494
    Peer-reviewed2024-06-05

Talk it over

Four questions to start on
Who carries this cost, and what would have to change to prevent it?

Start with a question

Review of 45 studies finds AI's downsides hurt customer trust and saleshttps://truvace.com/item/the-dark-side-of-artificial-intelligence-in-marketing-meta-analytics-review

  1. Who carries this cost, and what would have to change to prevent it?

    The problem A meta-analysis of 45 studies (N = 19,503) found that privacy concern, perceived risk, customer alienation and uniqueness neglect from AI had significant negative effects on customers' trust, satisfaction, purchasing, loyalty and well-being.

    Answer in the thread
  2. How do we know? What can this kind of evidence show, and what can’t it?

    The evidence This rests on a systematic review or meta-analysis with a sample of 19,503, from Marketing Intelligence & Planning.

    Answer in the thread
  3. What does it leave open? What else would you want to know before acting on it?

    Answer in the thread
  4. Have you seen AI used this way where you study, work or live? Did it go the same way?

    Answer in the thread

The questions are the same on every record. The details under them are taken from this record as written.

What readers say