Emerging evidence
More
Christopher Nolan talks about the DGA’s guidelines against AI usage in films and ‘The Odyssey’s protection against AI training models: ‘We have to strongly resist that'
- Evidence type
- News report
- Sources
- 1 sourceJournalism
- Published
- 2 min read
- Truvace record
- TRV-2026-2448cite or check it
Christopher Nolan discusses the Directors Guild of America’s new guidelines on AI in filmmaking during an interview, emphasizing the need for accountability in AI usage and his film 'The Odyssey's' distinctive anti-AI credits. Christopher Nolan talks about the DGA’s guidelines against AI usage in films and ‘The Odyssey’s protection against AI training models: ‘We have to strongly resist that'. (Instagram) Directors Guild of America (DGA) and Alliance of Motion Picture and

The gain
The Odyssey's credits now state that the film cannot be ingested, scraped or used as training data for generative AI, which Nolan says is a first for a film's end boilerplate.
In brief
Director Christopher Nolan said on the 'Hollywood Insiders' podcast that he is glad the Directors Guild of America and the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers agreed stricter guardrails on AI use in film. He also pointed to the credits of his film The Odyssey, which state that it can never be ingested, scraped or used as training data for generative AI models.
Nolan said he believes the notice is the first of its kind in a film's boilerplate, and he credited the production studio for including it. He argued that AI is too broad a term and that companies use it to avoid responsibility, which he said must be strongly resisted.
The article reports Nolan's views rather than measured results. He said the fight will be long and ongoing, and that studios, not the guild, hold the copyrights and must act on them.
Main points
- The DGA and AMPTP recently agreed stricter guardrails on AI use in the film industry.
- The Odyssey's credits say the film cannot be ingested, scraped or used as training data for generative AI models in any manner.
- Nolan said the notice is the first time such a message has appeared in a film's boilerplate.
- Nolan said very few guild members hold copyrights, so studios must protect the films.
- He said companies hide behind fair use provisions, which he believes will not hold up in court in the longer term.
- He said there have already been some significant judgments against such fair use claims.
The full story
Nolan spoke on the 'Hollywood Insiders' podcast about the DGA and AMPTP guardrails. He said he welcomes them but that how AI is used keeps changing, and he called AI too big a catchall term that companies use to absolve themselves of responsibility.
On The Odyssey, he said he was proud of the credits language barring ingestion as training data and grateful to the studio. He called it a principle and said it protects film workers from having their work stolen and repurposed.
On legal ground, Nolan said legislation already protects creators and that fair use defences will not hold up in court over the longer term, citing significant judgments already made. He said the effort will be ongoing.
Talk it overFour questions for a class, a team or the dinner table
Who gets this benefit, and who was left out of the study or story?
The gain The Odyssey's credits now state that the film cannot be ingested, scraped or used as training data for generative AI, which Nolan says is a first for a film's end boilerplate.
How do we know? What can this kind of evidence show, and what can’t it?
The evidence This rests on a news report, from Times of India.
What does it leave open? What else would you want to know before acting on it?
Have you seen AI used this way where you study, work or live? Did it go the same way?
The questions are the same on every record. The details under them are taken from this record as written.
Sources
1 on file- Times of Indiatimesofindia.indiatimes.com
ace







The debate