70/100

Moderate evidence

GainPublished recordEducationGood Space

The Effect of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Personalized Learning on Student Learning Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis Based on 31 Empirical Research Papers

Truvace record
TRV-2026-2849raw data (JSON)
Version
v1Published
First published
Evidence type
Systematic review or meta-analysis
Sources
1 sourcePeer-reviewed
sha256
730c1cf949b8…check it

The application of artificial intelligence in education has garnered more attention in academia, and its role in promoting student personalized learning has sparked a lot of discussion. Many researchers have emphasized the positive effect of intelligent technology in supporting student personalized learning; however, there is a lack of systematic data evidence in this regard. This article seeks to evaluate the effects of artificial intelligence-assisted personalized learning on student learning outcomes based on…

The gain

A meta-analysis of 36 experimental and quasi-experimental studies from 31 papers found AI-assisted personalized learning had moderately positive effects on students' knowledge, competence and emotional development.

Sources

1 on file
  1. Science Insights Education Frontiersdoi:10.15354/sief.24.re395
    Peer-reviewed2024-09-30

Cite this record

v1

Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-2849, v1: “The Effect of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Personalized Learning on Student Learning Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis Based on 31 Empirical Research Papers.” Truvace, 2026-11-12. /record/TRV-2026-2849 (accessed on the day you copy it). sha256 730c1cf949b841c2…

Change history

1 version

Every change made to this record since it was first published, and why. Nothing has changed since it went up.

  1. Publishedv1730c1cf949b8…

    Certified into the record

Check this record hasn’t been altered

Check this record hasn’t been altered
How to check it yourself, without trusting this page

Download any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-2849 and hash its canonical field yourself, for example with shasum -a 256. You should get its content_hash. Each version’s text also ends with prev:and the hash of the version before it (version 1 points to 64 zeros). If anyone had changed a single character of any version after it was saved, those hashes wouldn’t line up.