aceModerate evidence
Published recordEducationGood Space
More
The effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in learning outcomes of nursing students: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs)
- Truvace record
- TRV-2026-2844raw data (JSON)
- Version
- v1Published
- First published
- Evidence type
- Systematic review or meta-analysis
- Sources
- 1 sourcePeer-reviewed
- sha256
- 408368dd0661…check it
BackgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to revolutionize nursing education by enhancing learning experiences and educational outcomes. While researchers have investigated the usefulness of AI-based technology in nursing education, a systematic review emphasising randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is required to provide solid evidence to address educators' scepticism of its application. In this review, we provide evidence-based insights from RCTs to guide nursing educators and policymakers in en…
The gain
A meta-analysis of five randomized trials found AI-based learning tools were linked to better skill performance, satisfaction and confidence and lower anxiety and cognitive load among nursing students.
What this doesn’t fix
Only five randomized trials were included, and the pooled effect on knowledge level was small and not statistically significant.
Sources
1 on file- STEM Educationdoi:10.3934/steme.2025026
Cite this record
v1Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-2844, v1: “The effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in learning outcomes of nursing students: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).” Truvace, 2026-11-12. /record/TRV-2026-2844 (accessed on the day you copy it). sha256 408368dd06618f5b…
Change history
1 versionEvery change made to this record since it was first published, and why. Nothing has changed since it went up.
Certified into the record
Check this record hasn’t been altered
How to check it yourself, without trusting this page
Download any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-2844 and hash its canonical field yourself, for example with shasum -a 256. You should get its content_hash. Each version’s text also ends with prev:and the hash of the version before it (version 1 points to 64 zeros). If anyone had changed a single character of any version after it was saved, those hashes wouldn’t line up.