aceModerate evidence
Published recordEducationGood Space
More
Effects of an AI-enhanced BOPPPS teaching model in nursing courses: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Truvace record
- TRV-2026-2815raw data (JSON)
- Version
- v1Published
- First published
- Evidence type
- Systematic review or meta-analysis
- Sources
- 1 sourcePeer-reviewed
- sha256
- ffd8be070552…check it
Aim To evaluate the effectiveness of an artificial intelligence (AI)–enhanced BOPPPS teaching model in nursing courses, with a focus on academic performance, self-directed learning ability, and teaching satisfaction. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in accordance with PRISMA and registered in INPLASY (INPLASY202590123). Methods Chinese- and English-language databases were searched for eligible RCTs comparing AI-enhanced BOPPPS with traditional teaching (…
The gain
A meta-analysis of four randomized trials with 459 nursing students found AI-enhanced BOPPPS teaching raised academic performance (SMD 1.06) and tripled the odds of an 'excellent' self-directed learning rating (RR 3.28) versus traditional teaching.
What this doesn’t fix
The review included only four mostly single-center trials with short-term interventions and no standardized way of integrating AI, and blinding was inadequate in some trials.
Sources
1 on file- Frontiers in Medicinedoi:10.3389/fmed.2026.1767911
What the review found when it combined the studies
These are the review’s own pooled results, copied from its abstract. Truvace did not recalculate them.
Proportion of nursing students rated excellent in self-directed learning with AI-enhanced BOPPPS versus control
Risk ratio 3.28 (95% CI 2.14 to 5.02)
459 people · search to October 14, 2025
The review’s own words
The meta-analysis showed that the proportion of students rated as “excellent” in self-directed learning ability was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (RR = 3.28, 95% CI: 2.14–5.02; p < 0.001), indicating that the AI-enhanced BOPPPS model substantially improved students’ self-directed learning ability.
Nursing students' academic performance with AI-enhanced BOPPPS teaching compared with traditional teaching
SMD 1.06 (95% CI 0.63 to 1.48)
459 people · search to October 14, 2025
The review’s own words
The meta-analysis showed a statistically significant improvement in academic performance in the AI-enhanced BOPPPS group compared with the control group (SMD = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.63–1.48; p = 0.025).
Proportion of nursing students very satisfied with teaching, AI-enhanced BOPPPS versus control
Risk ratio 1.80 (95% CI 1.27 to 2.55)
459 people · search to October 14, 2025
The review’s own words
The meta-analysis showed that the AI-enhanced BOPPPS model significantly increased teaching satisfaction compared with the control condition (RR = 1.80, 95% CI: 1.27–2.55; p < 0.001), indicating a substantial improvement.
Code checks every number above against the review’s text before it is shown. The short labels are an AI model’s reading of that text, so the review’s own sentence sits under each one. A pooled figure is only as strong as the studies behind it. How Truvace uses pooled results
Cite this record
v1Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-2815, v1: “Effects of an AI-enhanced BOPPPS teaching model in nursing courses: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.” Truvace, 2026-11-12. /record/TRV-2026-2815 (accessed on the day you copy it). sha256 ffd8be070552b536…
Change history
1 versionEvery change made to this record since it was first published, and why. Nothing has changed since it went up.
Certified into the record
Check this record hasn’t been altered
How to check it yourself, without trusting this page
Download any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-2815 and hash its canonical field yourself, for example with shasum -a 256. You should get its content_hash. Each version’s text also ends with prev:and the hash of the version before it (version 1 points to 64 zeros). If anyone had changed a single character of any version after it was saved, those hashes wouldn’t line up.