Moderate evidence
Published recordHealthProblem Space
More
Large language models in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review of examination performance, knowledge acquisition, and learner perceptions
- Truvace record
- TRV-2026-2769raw data (JSON)
- Version
- v1Published
- First published
- Evidence type
- Systematic review or meta-analysis
- Sources
- 1 sourcePeer-reviewed
- sha256
- a68f1017925d…check it
BACKGROUND: Large language models (LLMs), particularly successive iterations of ChatGPT (GPT-3.5 and GPT-4), have demonstrated increasingly sophisticated performance on standardised medical assessments and are now widely accessible to undergraduate medical students worldwide. Although the evidence base has expanded rapidly since ChatGPT's public release in November 2022, findings remain fragmented across three largely distinct research domains: examination performance, knowledge acquisition, and learner percepti…
The problem
In a systematic review of 43 studies covering about 12,400 participants, 82% of medical students reported receiving no institutional guidance on using AI chatbots, and 61% raised academic integrity concerns.
What this doesn’t fix
Risk of bias was moderate-to-high in 86% of the included studies, and the learning gains were short-term only, without durable retention, so the benefit findings are tentative.
Sources
1 on file- BMC Medical Educationdoi:10.1186/s12909-026-09999-7
Cite this record
v1Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-2769, v1: “Large language models in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review of examination performance, knowledge acquisition, and learner perceptions.” Truvace, 2026-11-12. /record/TRV-2026-2769 (accessed on the day you copy it). sha256 a68f1017925da344…
Change history
1 versionEvery change made to this record since it was first published, and why. Nothing has changed since it went up.
Certified into the record
Check this record hasn’t been altered
How to check it yourself, without trusting this page
Download any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-2769 and hash its canonical field yourself, for example with shasum -a 256. You should get its content_hash. Each version’s text also ends with prev:and the hash of the version before it (version 1 points to 64 zeros). If anyone had changed a single character of any version after it was saved, those hashes wouldn’t line up.
ace