aceModerate evidence
Published recordScienceGood Space
More
The Impact of Digital and Artificial Intelligence Technologies on the Improvement of Foreign Language Listening, Speaking, Reading and Writing Skills: A Meta‐Analysis
- Truvace record
- TRV-2026-2758raw data (JSON)
- Version
- v1Published
- First published
- Evidence type
- Systematic review or meta-analysis
- Sources
- 1 sourcePeer-reviewed
- sha256
- 3d9a0b6b0495…check it
ABSTRACT Background With the continuous advancement of educational technology, the application of digital and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in foreign language learning has gradually become an effective means of enhancing language skills. Utilising personalised feedback, intelligent learning support and instant interaction, these technologies have been widely adopted for cultivating foreign language skills such as listening, speaking, reading and writing. However, existing meta‐analysis primarily foc…
The gain
A meta-analysis of 40 studies with 3,367 participants found digital and AI technologies had a large positive effect on foreign language proficiency (overall effect size 0.962).
What this doesn’t fix
The duration and number-of-technologies findings should be read cautiously, because the patterns were not linear and some subgroups contained only a small number of studies.
Sources
1 on file- Journal of Computer Assisted Learningdoi:10.1002/jcal.70325
Cite this record
v1Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-2758, v1: “The Impact of Digital and Artificial Intelligence Technologies on the Improvement of Foreign Language Listening, Speaking, Reading and Writing Skills: A Meta‐Analysis.” Truvace, 2026-11-12. /record/TRV-2026-2758 (accessed on the day you copy it). sha256 3d9a0b6b04952dcc…
Change history
1 versionEvery change made to this record since it was first published, and why. Nothing has changed since it went up.
Certified into the record
Check this record hasn’t been altered
How to check it yourself, without trusting this page
Download any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-2758 and hash its canonical field yourself, for example with shasum -a 256. You should get its content_hash. Each version’s text also ends with prev:and the hash of the version before it (version 1 points to 64 zeros). If anyone had changed a single character of any version after it was saved, those hashes wouldn’t line up.