68/100

Moderate evidence

Trace: a gain and a problemPublished recordHealthThe Trace

The Role Of Self-Referential Social Cues and Small Talk In Large Language Model-Based Health Coaching: Enhancing Anthropomorphism and User Trust

Truvace record
TRV-2026-2694raw data (JSON)
Version
v1Published
First published
Evidence type
Controlled or validated comparison
Sources
1 sourcePeer-reviewed
sha256
05477ae3b11b…check it

This paper investigates the role of anthropomorphic design in Large Language Models (LLMs), particularly in the context of lifestyle behavior change coaching. This study examines how specific verbal social cues – namely small talk and self-referential social cues – affect user perceptions of anthropomorphism, trust, and eeriness. Findings from a 2x2 experiment show that self-referential social cues enhance perceptions of anthropomorphism, which in turn positively influence user trust. At the same time, the combi…

56Gain side

How the two sides scoreClose call

57Problem side

The gain

In a 2x2 experiment on an LLM lifestyle-coaching chatbot, self-referential social cues raised users' perception of the coach as humanlike, which in turn increased their trust in it.

The problem

In the same 2x2 lifestyle-coaching experiment, combining self-referential cues with small talk had adverse effects on user perceptions, suggesting an uncanny valley effect in text-based chat.

A fixed formula sets both scores from the evidence and its sources. Reader votes don’t move them.

What the scores mean

G is the gain side, out of 100. It goes up when the gain is specific, when it measurably helped people and when the sources behind it are strong.

P is the problem side, out of 100. It goes up when the problem is specific, when it measurably hurt people and when the sources behind it are strong.

Sources

1 on file
  1. Peer-reviewed2026-06-14

Cite this record

v1

Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-2694, v1: “The Role Of Self-Referential Social Cues and Small Talk In Large Language Model-Based Health Coaching: Enhancing Anthropomorphism and User Trust.” Truvace, 2026-11-12. /record/TRV-2026-2694 (accessed on the day you copy it). sha256 05477ae3b11b789a…

Change history

1 version

Every change made to this record since it was first published, and why. Nothing has changed since it went up.

  1. Publishedv105477ae3b11b…

    Certified into the record

Check this record hasn’t been altered

Check this record hasn’t been altered
How to check it yourself, without trusting this page

Download any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-2694 and hash its canonical field yourself, for example with shasum -a 256. You should get its content_hash. Each version’s text also ends with prev:and the hash of the version before it (version 1 points to 64 zeros). If anyone had changed a single character of any version after it was saved, those hashes wouldn’t line up.