TRV-2026-2691Version 1 · Published

Saved · see the current record

Why this version exists

Certified into the record

The exact text we saved

This is the version exactly as it was saved, character for character. The SHA-256 hash below is a 64-character code worked out from that text. Run the same text through SHA-256 and you get the same code; change a single letter and the code comes out completely different. Each version also stores the previous version’s hash, which chains them together so no version can be swapped out quietly.

TRUVACE RECORD VERSION
record: TRV-2026-2691
version: 1
kind: certified
reason: Certified into the record
timestamp: 2026-11-12T17:01:16.820912Z
status: published
lens: p_space
sector: business
headline: Are You Ready for Human-like AI Service Agents: Consumers’ Willingness to Use Substitute Versus Assist AI on OTA Platforms
dek: With the rapid development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology, human-like AI service agents have been increasingly applied in service marketing. Online travel agency (OTA) platforms provide an important application context for such service agents in consumer-facing service interactions, such as travel planning and related services. Drawing on social cognitive theory and control theory, this study examines the psychological mechanisms underlying consumers’ intentions to adopt AI service agents. One pretes…
gain_title: (none)
problem_title: In a pretest and two experiments with 521 participants, consumers were less willing to use AI service agents on online travel platforms when the agents replaced human staff than when they assisted them, an effect linked to human identity threat and a lower sense of control.
trace_subject: (none)
gain_reading: (none)
gain_evidence: (none)
problem_reading: In a pretest and two experiments with 521 participants, consumers were less willing to use AI service agents on online travel platforms when the agents replaced human staff than when they assisted them, an effect linked to human identity threat and a lower sense of control.
problem_evidence: consumers are more willing to use assist AI service agents than substitute AI service agents | This effect is mediated by human identity threat and sense of control.
quick_read: A study combining one pretest and two experiments with 521 participants found that consumers are more willing to use AI service agents that assist human staff than agents that substitute for them. The setting was online travel agency platforms, where human-like AI agents handle tasks such as travel planning.

The researchers traced the gap to two psychological mechanisms: human identity threat and sense of control. Substitute agents appear to trigger more of the former and weaken the latter, which lowers willingness to use them.

Consumers with higher technology readiness showed a smaller preference for assistive over substitute agents. The authors say the findings bear on how AI agents should be designed and deployed on travel platforms.
limitation: 
tag: Evidence-backed problem
key_points: The study ran one pretest and two experiments with 521 participants in total. | Consumers were more willing to use assist AI agents than substitute AI agents on online travel platforms. | Human identity threat and sense of control mediated the effect of the agent's role on willingness to use it. | Higher technology readiness moderated the effect and narrowed the preference for assistive agents. | The work draws on social cognitive theory and control theory.
rundown: The research looks at human-like AI service agents in online travel agency platforms, a consumer-facing setting that includes travel planning and related services. It compares two agent roles: substitute agents that take over a service task and assist agents that support human service staff.

Across the pretest and two experiments, which involved 521 participants, assist agents drew greater willingness to use than substitute agents. Mediation analysis pointed to human identity threat and sense of control as the channels through which role affected intentions.

Technology readiness changed the picture: people more comfortable with technology showed a weaker preference for assistive over substitute agents. The authors conclude that role framing matters for how OTA platforms should deploy AI agents.
sources:
- peer_reviewed | Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research | https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer21060160 | 2026-05-22
prev: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
SHA-256 hash
34ad67b3293ae93278efa9da8668b0f5a152ea6832c1ca56ce125d4886b345b7
Previous version’s hash
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Check this record hasn’t been altered
How to check it yourself, without trusting this page

Download any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-2691 and hash its canonical field yourself, for example with shasum -a 256. You should get its content_hash. Each version’s text also ends with prev:and the hash of the version before it (version 1 points to 64 zeros). If anyone had changed a single character of any version after it was saved, those hashes wouldn’t line up.