68/100

Moderate evidence

ProblemPublished recordBusinessProblem Space

When Old Is Not Gold: The Interactive Effect of Brand Age and AI Disclosure on Ad-Clicking Interest

Truvace record
TRV-2026-2667raw data (JSON)
Version
v1Published
First published
Evidence type
Controlled or validated comparison
Sources
1 sourcePeer-reviewed
sha256
2a30dacb26d4…check it

Artificial intelligence (AI) disclosure in advertising is increasingly common, yet prior research reports mixed findings, with evidence of both favorable and unfavorable consumer responses. Drawing on schema congruity theory, this research proposes that brand age represents an important but overlooked boundary condition of consumer responses to AI disclosure. Three experiments demonstrate that AI disclosure reduces consumers’ interest in clicking advertisements for old brands, whereas this negative effect does n…

The problem

In three experiments, disclosing that advertising involved AI reduced consumers' interest in clicking ads for old brands, while ads for young brands showed no such drop.

What this doesn’t fix

The negative effect of AI disclosure was found only for old brands and did not emerge for young brands, so the result does not apply to advertising in general.

Sources

1 on file
  1. Journal of Interactive Advertisingdoi:10.1080/15252019.2026.2707403
    Peer-reviewed2026-08-11

Cite this record

v1

Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-2667, v1: “When Old Is Not Gold: The Interactive Effect of Brand Age and AI Disclosure on Ad-Clicking Interest.” Truvace, 2026-11-12. /record/TRV-2026-2667 (accessed on the day you copy it). sha256 2a30dacb26d4d01b…

Change history

1 version

Every change made to this record since it was first published, and why. Nothing has changed since it went up.

  1. Publishedv12a30dacb26d4…

    Certified into the record

Check this record hasn’t been altered

Check this record hasn’t been altered
How to check it yourself, without trusting this page

Download any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-2667 and hash its canonical field yourself, for example with shasum -a 256. You should get its content_hash. Each version’s text also ends with prev:and the hash of the version before it (version 1 points to 64 zeros). If anyone had changed a single character of any version after it was saved, those hashes wouldn’t line up.