Certified into the record
The exact text we saved
This is the version exactly as it was saved, character for character. The SHA-256 hash below is a 64-character code worked out from that text. Run the same text through SHA-256 and you get the same code; change a single letter and the code comes out completely different. Each version also stores the previous version’s hash, which chains them together so no version can be swapped out quietly.
TRUVACE RECORD VERSION record: TRV-2026-2656 version: 1 kind: certified reason: Certified into the record timestamp: 2026-11-12T16:57:21.217677Z status: published lens: g_space sector: lifestyle headline: Android embodiment with facial mimicry may enhance emotional responses during conversations with AI agents dek: The potential of artificial intelligence (AI) agents to engage in emotional conversations with humans is attracting increasing attention. Previous studies suggested that conversational agents powered by large language models such as ChatGPT can engage in emotionally competent conversations with humans. However, whether verbal communication alone is sufficient or whether nonverbal communication might exert additive effects on emotional conversations remains unknown. We conducted an experiment to examine whether a… gain_title: In an experiment on positive conversations with ChatGPT, participants who talked to it through an android robot with facial mimicry rated their feelings as more positive and showed more smiling-muscle activity than those using a blank display. problem_title: (none) trace_subject: (none) gain_reading: In an experiment on positive conversations with ChatGPT, participants who talked to it through an android robot with facial mimicry rated their feelings as more positive and showed more smiling-muscle activity than those using a blank display. gain_evidence: Participants reported significantly more positive valence ratings, and showed greater zygomaticus major EMG activity when interacting with the android than with the display. problem_reading: (none) problem_evidence: (none) quick_read: Researchers tested whether a physical face changes how people feel when they talk with a conversational AI. Participants held positive emotional conversations with ChatGPT, delivered either through an android robot that mimicked facial expressions or through a blank display. Participants in the android condition reported significantly more positive valence ratings and showed greater activity in the zygomaticus major, a cheek muscle involved in smiling, than those facing the display. The authors describe the results as initial evidence. Arousal, frown-muscle activity and skin conductance did not differ significantly between the two interfaces, so the effect was limited to positive feeling and smiling. limitation: The authors describe the findings as initial evidence, and arousal, corrugator EMG activity and skin conductance level showed no significant effects. tag: Evidence-backed gain key_points: Participants had positive emotional conversations with ChatGPT through either an android robot showing facial mimicry or a blank display. | Self-reported valence was significantly more positive with the android than with the display. | Zygomaticus major EMG activity, linked to smiling, was greater during conversations with the android. | Arousal ratings, corrugator supercilii EMG activity and skin conductance level showed no significant differences. | The authors call the findings initial evidence that android embodiment may enhance positive emotional responses. rundown: The study addresses an open question: earlier work suggested that large language model agents such as ChatGPT can hold emotionally competent conversations, but it was unknown whether words alone suffice or whether nonverbal cues add to the effect. To test this, the team compared two interfaces for the same ChatGPT conversations. They measured emotional experience through valence and arousal ratings, and body responses through facial electromyography of the corrugator supercilii and zygomaticus major muscles plus skin conductance level. Only the valence and zygomaticus measures differed significantly, both favouring the android. Arousal, corrugator activity and skin conductance did not, which leaves the evidence for a broader emotional effect unsettled. sources: - peer_reviewed | Telematics and Informatics Reports | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2026.100379 | 2026-10-12 prev: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
- SHA-256 hash
- 4b61142c0aac0f20258fc4b77c55aec087687b1a9e5ef81c6ca6be9fc6a71f25
- Previous version’s hash
- 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
How to check it yourself, without trusting this page
Download any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-2656 and hash its canonical field yourself, for example with shasum -a 256. You should get its content_hash. Each version’s text also ends with prev:and the hash of the version before it (version 1 points to 64 zeros). If anyone had changed a single character of any version after it was saved, those hashes wouldn’t line up.
ace