Moderate evidence
Published recordLifestyleGood Space
More
Luxury fashion brands’ AI-powered sustainability chatbot communication: how information qualities and brand luxury perception shape consumer trust and behavior
- Truvace record
- TRV-2026-2644raw data (JSON)
- Version
- v1Published
- First published
- Evidence type
- Controlled or validated comparison
- Sources
- 1 sourcePeer-reviewed
- sha256
- 0d6cae99857d…check it
This study examines how sustainability communication in luxury retail shapes brand trust and behavioral intentions, focusing on consumers' post-exposure perceptions of information quality and provider type. Building on perceived objectivity and perceived persuasiveness, the study explores how consumers evaluate identical sustainability information attributed to either a human agent or an artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot, and how these perceptions influence brand trust, information acceptance intention, and p…
The gain
In a scenario experiment with 346 US online consumers shown identical Gucci sustainability messages, perceived objectivity raised purchase intention through brand trust only when the messages came from an AI chatbot, not from a human agent.
What this doesn’t fix
The brand-luxury findings come from split-sample subgroup comparisons rather than a formal interaction test, and two measures (perceived objectivity and purchase intention) had low Cronbach's alpha (.519 and .559), so results should be treated cautiously.
Sources
1 on file- Fashion and Textilesdoi:10.1186/s40691-026-00493-8
Cite this record
v1Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-2644, v1: “Luxury fashion brands’ AI-powered sustainability chatbot communication: how information qualities and brand luxury perception shape consumer trust and behavior.” Truvace, 2026-11-12. /record/TRV-2026-2644 (accessed on the day you copy it). sha256 0d6cae99857dbd0d…
Change history
1 versionEvery change made to this record since it was first published, and why. Nothing has changed since it went up.
Certified into the record
Check this record hasn’t been altered
How to check it yourself, without trusting this page
Download any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-2644 and hash its canonical field yourself, for example with shasum -a 256. You should get its content_hash. Each version’s text also ends with prev:and the hash of the version before it (version 1 points to 64 zeros). If anyone had changed a single character of any version after it was saved, those hashes wouldn’t line up.
ace