68/100

Moderate evidence

Trace: a gain and a problemPublished recordHealthThe Trace

Encouraging disclosure: the role of personalization in pre-consultation chatbots

Truvace record
TRV-2026-2641raw data (JSON)
Version
v1Published
First published
Evidence type
Controlled or validated comparison
Sources
1 sourcePeer-reviewed
sha256
3c803993f807…check it

Purpose This study aims to explore how personalized services provided by pre-consultation chatbots influence patients' intentions to self-disclose and the boundary conditions of this effect. Drawing on the Communication Privacy Management Theory, it identifies AI interactive trust as a mediator and examines how disease sensitivity moderates this mechanism. Design/methodology/approach Three scenario experiments and a field survey were conducted to test hypotheses. Experiments 1 and 2 were between-subjects experim…

60Gain side

How the two sides scoreClose call

56Problem side

The gain

In three scenario experiments and a field survey, researchers found that a more personalized pre-consultation chatbot increased patients' willingness to self-disclose by building trust in the AI, for low-sensitivity diseases.

The problem

In three scenario experiments and a field survey on pre-consultation chatbots, the trust-driven boost in patients' willingness to self-disclose weakened or disappeared for high-sensitivity diseases.

A fixed formula sets both scores from the evidence and its sources. Reader votes don’t move them.

What the scores mean

G is the gain side, out of 100. It goes up when the gain is specific, when it measurably helped people and when the sources behind it are strong.

P is the problem side, out of 100. It goes up when the problem is specific, when it measurably hurt people and when the sources behind it are strong.

What this doesn’t fix

The main experiments used scenario designs, and the trust-based effect weakened or disappeared for high-sensitivity conditions, so findings do not show that personalization encourages disclosure across all diseases.

Sources

1 on file
  1. Peer-reviewed2026-10-22

Cite this record

v1

Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-2641, v1: “Encouraging disclosure: the role of personalization in pre-consultation chatbots.” Truvace, 2026-11-12. /record/TRV-2026-2641 (accessed on the day you copy it). sha256 3c803993f80754ba…

Change history

1 version

Every change made to this record since it was first published, and why. Nothing has changed since it went up.

  1. Publishedv13c803993f807…

    Certified into the record

Check this record hasn’t been altered

Check this record hasn’t been altered
How to check it yourself, without trusting this page

Download any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-2641 and hash its canonical field yourself, for example with shasum -a 256. You should get its content_hash. Each version’s text also ends with prev:and the hash of the version before it (version 1 points to 64 zeros). If anyone had changed a single character of any version after it was saved, those hashes wouldn’t line up.