Certified into the record
The exact text we saved
This is the version exactly as it was saved, character for character. The SHA-256 hash below is a 64-character code worked out from that text. Run the same text through SHA-256 and you get the same code; change a single letter and the code comes out completely different. Each version also stores the previous version’s hash, which chains them together so no version can be swapped out quietly.
TRUVACE RECORD VERSION record: TRV-2026-2570 version: 1 kind: certified reason: Certified into the record timestamp: 2026-11-12T07:55:32.998182Z status: published lens: g_space sector: lifestyle headline: Chatbot appearance and loneliness trajectories in women with high autistic traits dek: Chatbots are increasingly explored as tools to support social and emotional well-being. However, little is known about how chatbot visual appearance influences user outcomes over time, particularly among individuals with elevated autistic traits. This study examined whether chatbot appearance shapes loneliness trajectories among women with high autistic traits who used a chatbot at least three times per week. A randomized longitudinal experiment compared two conditions that were identical in function, dialogue s… gain_title: In a randomized trial of 72 women with high autistic traits, loneliness fell over eight weeks with a non-human-looking chatbot, while it stayed near zero change with a human-like one. problem_title: (none) trace_subject: (none) gain_reading: In a randomized trial of 72 women with high autistic traits, loneliness fell over eight weeks with a non-human-looking chatbot, while it stayed near zero change with a human-like one. gain_evidence: loneliness decreased in the non-human appearance condition | the slope was bounded near zero in the human-like condition problem_reading: (none) problem_evidence: (none) quick_read: Researchers randomly assigned 72 women with high autistic traits who used a chatbot at least three times a week to an eight-week trial. One group used a chatbot with a non-human visual appearance, the other a chatbot with a human-like appearance. Loneliness fell in the non-human group, while the human-like group showed essentially no change. The two chatbots were identical in function, dialogue strategy and usage structure, so appearance was the only difference. The authors say this suggests appearance affects longer-term outcomes, not only first impressions, and call it a core design dimension for neurodiverse users. The result applies to a specific group of women who were already regular chatbot users, and the human-like group's slope had a wide confidence interval from −0.92 to 0.99. limitation: tag: Evidence-backed gain key_points: Seventy-two women with high autistic traits took part in a randomized longitudinal experiment lasting eight weeks. | Participants used either a non-human-looking or a human-like-looking chatbot; function, dialogue strategy and usage structure were identical. | Loneliness was measured at four time points and analyzed with linear mixed-effects models. | The Group × Time interaction was significant, meaning the loneliness trajectories differed between groups. | Loneliness decreased in the non-human condition, while the human-like condition's slope stayed near zero (95% CI −0.92 to 0.99). | Baseline loneliness did not differ between the two groups. rundown: The study recruited women with elevated autistic traits who already used a chatbot at least three times per week. Participants were randomized to one of two conditions that differed only in visual appearance: non-human or human-like. Over eight weeks, loneliness was measured at four points. The researchers predicted that loneliness would decline in the non-human condition and decline more steeply than in the human-like condition; both predictions were supported. Baseline loneliness was similar across groups, so the divergence emerged during the period of use. In the human-like group the slope was bounded near zero, with a confidence interval from −0.92 to 0.99. The authors conclude that appearance can shape longer-term interaction outcomes and warrants longitudinal evaluation when designing chatbots for neurodiverse users. sources: - peer_reviewed | Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2026.100369 | 2026-08-01 prev: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
- SHA-256 hash
- 426a73bd1088711d5e1d3d24ea0515153d4949140f6269e7c7628cb830609c7b
- Previous version’s hash
- 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
How to check it yourself, without trusting this page
Download any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-2570 and hash its canonical field yourself, for example with shasum -a 256. You should get its content_hash. Each version’s text also ends with prev:and the hash of the version before it (version 1 points to 64 zeros). If anyone had changed a single character of any version after it was saved, those hashes wouldn’t line up.
ace