Certified into the record
The exact text we saved
This is the version exactly as it was saved, character for character. The SHA-256 hash below is a 64-character code worked out from that text. Run the same text through SHA-256 and you get the same code; change a single letter and the code comes out completely different. Each version also stores the previous version’s hash, which chains them together so no version can be swapped out quietly.
TRUVACE RECORD VERSION record: TRV-2026-2547 version: 1 kind: certified reason: Certified into the record timestamp: 2026-11-12T07:51:57.898303Z status: published lens: p_space sector: labor headline: When AI supervises humans: how AI management triggers self-objectification and undermines proactive behavior dek: Purpose The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into daily operations and management has become increasingly prevalent within the hospitality industry. However, the impact of transitioning managerial roles from humans to AI on hotel employees’ cognition and work behavior remains an unresolved issue. This paper aims to examine the relationship between AI management and proactive work behavior by identifying self-objectification as a mediator and AI identity as a moderator. Design/methodology/approach This… gain_title: (none) problem_title: In two scenario experiments with 328 hotel employees, those managed by AI were only half as likely to engage in proactive work behavior as those managed by humans. trace_subject: (none) gain_reading: (none) gain_evidence: (none) problem_reading: In two scenario experiments with 328 hotel employees, those managed by AI were only half as likely to engage in proactive work behavior as those managed by humans. problem_evidence: employees managed by AI are only half as likely to engage in proactive work behavior as those managed by humans quick_read: Two scenario-based experiments with 328 hotel employees compared AI management with human management. Employees under AI management showed more self-objectification, meaning they were more prone to seeing themselves as objects. Logistic regression showed they were only half as likely to engage in proactive work behavior as those managed by humans. The result matters for hotels moving managerial tasks from people to AI. The study treats self-objectification as the mechanism linking AI supervision to less initiative, which suggests the effect runs through how workers see themselves rather than through task design alone. Employees with a strong AI identity were less susceptible to self-objectification. The authors recommend AI identity training and employee development programs, though the evidence comes from hypothetical scenarios rather than workplaces that actually use AI managers. limitation: The findings come from two scenario-based experiments rather than observation of hotel employees working under real AI managers. tag: Evidence-backed problem key_points: The research combined two scenario-based experiments involving 328 hotel employees in total. | Study 1 found AI management, compared with human management, positively predicted self-objectification among employees. | Employees with a strong AI identity were less susceptible to self-objectification under AI management. | Study 2 corroborated Study 1 and found self-objectification mediated the link between AI management and proactive work behavior. | Logistic regression showed employees managed by AI were only half as likely to engage in proactive work behavior as those managed by humans. | The authors recommend that hotels run AI identity training and employee development programs. rundown: The study addresses the hospitality industry, where AI is increasingly used in daily operations and management. The authors say the effect of shifting managerial roles from humans to AI on hotel employees' cognition and work behavior had been unresolved. They used self-determination theory to frame the question. Study 1 found that AI management, compared with human management, positively predicted self-objectification. AI identity moderated this effect: employees with a strong AI identity were less susceptible to self-objectification. Study 2 replicated the Study 1 findings and showed self-objectification mediating the relationship between AI management and proactive work behavior. Logistic regression put the effect at half the likelihood of proactive behavior for employees managed by AI. The authors say hotels should build environments where employees feel empowered and valued, using AI identity training and development programs. sources: - peer_reviewed | International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management | https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-11-2025-1679 | 2026-07-28 prev: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
- SHA-256 hash
- 93d755bcf4b378e0e59dab943330a6a07ed027fb4a19af918fbe9142fc2477bc
- Previous version’s hash
- 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
How to check it yourself, without trusting this page
Download any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-2547 and hash its canonical field yourself, for example with shasum -a 256. You should get its content_hash. Each version’s text also ends with prev:and the hash of the version before it (version 1 points to 64 zeros). If anyone had changed a single character of any version after it was saved, those hashes wouldn’t line up.
ace