70/100

Moderate evidence

ProblemPublished recordBusinessProblem Space

Anthropomorphism and risk perception: The role of trust and domain knowledge in decision-support AI

Truvace record
TRV-2026-2503raw data (JSON)
Version
v1Published
First published
Evidence type
Controlled or validated comparison
Sources
1 sourcePeer-reviewed
sha256
fd6eae6449be…check it

Anthropomorphic design is increasingly used to make conversational AI systems more approachable and socially engaging, yet its effects on users’ risk judgments remain unclear. Drawing on theories of anthropomorphism and cognitive–affective trust, we develop a moderated mediation model explaining how perceived anthropomorphism relates to risk perception in AI decision support. We conducted a large-scale between-subjects online experiment (N = 1,256) using a simulated financial advisor chatbot with a 2 2 2 anthrop…

The problem

In an online experiment with 1,256 people, the more human-like a simulated financial chatbot seemed, the more participants trusted it and, through cognitive trust, the less risky they judged its investment advice, an effect strongest for those with low financial knowledge.

What this doesn’t fix

The authors note they inferred mental processes from psychometric questionnaires, and say the results suggest but do not prove that trust reduces risk perception; domain knowledge was self-reported and the advisor was a simulated chatbot.

Sources

1 on file
  1. Peer-reviewed2026-10-28

Cite this record

v1

Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-2503, v1: “Anthropomorphism and risk perception: The role of trust and domain knowledge in decision-support AI.” Truvace, 2026-11-12. /record/TRV-2026-2503 (accessed on the day you copy it). sha256 fd6eae6449be6811…

Change history

1 version

Every change made to this record since it was first published, and why. Nothing has changed since it went up.

  1. Publishedv1fd6eae6449be…

    Certified into the record

Check this record hasn’t been altered

Check this record hasn’t been altered
How to check it yourself, without trusting this page

Download any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-2503 and hash its canonical field yourself, for example with shasum -a 256. You should get its content_hash. Each version’s text also ends with prev:and the hash of the version before it (version 1 points to 64 zeros). If anyone had changed a single character of any version after it was saved, those hashes wouldn’t line up.