52/100

Moderate evidence

Trace: a gain and a problemPublished recordHealthThe Trace

Detecting spiritual pain in electronic medical records using large language models

Truvace record
TRV-2026-2499raw data (JSON)
Version
v1Published
First published
Evidence type
Benchmark or lab evaluation
Sources
1 sourcePeer-reviewed
sha256
ff04ebcdc98a…check it

PURPOSE: Spiritual pain is one dimension of total pain in terminally ill patients with cancer. Reducing the burden of assessing spiritual pain in electronic medical records is essential for improving the quality of spiritual care. Large language models may offer a solution. This study explored whether large language models can be used to develop an automatic system for accurately identifying spiritual pain in patients with terminal cancer. METHODS: We used unstructured nursing records from patients with cancer w…

53Gain side

How the two sides scoreClose call

51Problem side

The gain

In a study of 500 nursing records from 109 dying cancer patients in Japan, Gemini and Copilot each identified all 56 records with spiritual pain (sensitivity 1.00), with negative predictive value of 1.00.

The problem

In the same study, Gemini's positive predictive value was only 0.34 and Copilot's 0.25, and Gemini produced 111 false positives, often mistaking declining physical function or delirium for spiritual pain.

A fixed formula sets both scores from the evidence and its sources. Reader votes don’t move them.

What the scores mean

G is the gain side, out of 100. It goes up when the gain is specific, when it measurably helped people and when the sources behind it are strong.

P is the problem side, out of 100. It goes up when the problem is specific, when it measurably hurt people and when the sources behind it are strong.

What this doesn’t fix

The study used records from one Japanese university hospital, only two models, and 500 pre-filtered records from 109 patients, which the authors say may overestimate real-world performance.

Sources

1 on file
  1. Supportive Care in Cancerdoi:10.1007/s00520-026-11416-0
    Peer-reviewed2026-10-29

Cite this record

v1

Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-2499, v1: “Detecting spiritual pain in electronic medical records using large language models.” Truvace, 2026-11-12. /record/TRV-2026-2499 (accessed on the day you copy it). sha256 ff04ebcdc98ad80d…

Change history

1 version

Every change made to this record since it was first published, and why. Nothing has changed since it went up.

  1. Publishedv1ff04ebcdc98a…

    Certified into the record

Check this record hasn’t been altered

Check this record hasn’t been altered
How to check it yourself, without trusting this page

Download any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-2499 and hash its canonical field yourself, for example with shasum -a 256. You should get its content_hash. Each version’s text also ends with prev:and the hash of the version before it (version 1 points to 64 zeros). If anyone had changed a single character of any version after it was saved, those hashes wouldn’t line up.