TRV-2026-2466Version 1 · Published

Saved · see the current record

Why this version exists

Certified into the record

The exact text we saved

This is the version exactly as it was saved, character for character. The SHA-256 hash below is a 64-character code worked out from that text. Run the same text through SHA-256 and you get the same code; change a single letter and the code comes out completely different. Each version also stores the previous version’s hash, which chains them together so no version can be swapped out quietly.

TRUVACE RECORD VERSION
record: TRV-2026-2466
version: 1
kind: certified
reason: Certified into the record
timestamp: 2026-11-11T06:02:14.062024Z
status: published
lens: g_space
sector: science
headline: Anthropic launches Claude Fable 5.2 and Mythos 5.2, its most advanced AI models for coding, science, and cybersecurity
dek: Anthropic has launched Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2, two new AI models that the company says can tackle some of the hardest problems in software engineering, scientific research, and cybersecurity. The announcement includes extraordinary claims: the AI solved two longstanding problems in black hole physics, helped design three working electronic devices, and coordinated
gain_title: Anthropic says Mythos 5.2 identified 89.6% of tested vulnerabilities on its internal CVE Rediscovery evaluation versus 81.3% for Claude Opus 5.5, and Fable 5.2 scored 49.1% on FrontierCode 2.0 versus 42.8% for GPT-6 Astra.
problem_title: (none)
trace_subject: (none)
gain_reading: Anthropic says Mythos 5.2 identified 89.6% of tested vulnerabilities on its internal CVE Rediscovery evaluation versus 81.3% for Claude Opus 5.5, and Fable 5.2 scored 49.1% on FrontierCode 2.0 versus 42.8% for GPT-6 Astra.
gain_evidence: Mythos 5.2 identified 89.6% of tested vulnerabilities, compared with 81.3% for Claude Opus 5.5 and 78.3% for Mythos 5.1 | Fable 5.2 scored 49.1% on FrontierCode 2.0, compared with 42.8% for OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra
problem_reading: (none)
problem_evidence: (none)
quick_read: Anthropic launched Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2 on November 9, 2026. The company says Mythos 5.2 identified 89.6% of tested vulnerabilities on its internal CVE Rediscovery evaluation, against 81.3% for Claude Opus 5.5 and 78.3% for Mythos 5.1.

Anthropic also reports that Fable 5.2 scored 49.1% on FrontierCode 2.0, ahead of 42.8% for OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra and 41.1% for Google's Gemini 4 Carbon. Both models generate output up to 30% faster than the 5.1 versions and cost $8 per million input tokens and $40 per million output tokens.

All figures come from Anthropic's own testing, and the article notes they do not prove equal performance in real-world security settings. Gemini 4 Carbon led the reported AutomationBench business workflow test, and Anthropic acknowledges testing cannot predict every failure after deployment.
limitation: The benchmark results are Anthropic-reported, not proof that the model will perform equally well across real-world security environments, and Anthropic acknowledges that testing cannot predict every failure after deployment.
tag: Evidence-backed gain
key_points: Fable 5.2 at High effort matched Claude Opus 5.5 at Max effort on FrontierCode 2.0 at roughly half the cost per task, according to Anthropic's early testing. | Anthropic says Claude now writes more than 90% of the changes merged into its core codebase, with human engineers providing guidance and oversight. | An earlier version of Fable 5.2 migrated a production service from Python to Rust, with startup about 26 times faster, Anthropic says. | Fable 5.2 coordinated more than 1,000 subagents over eight days to build a prototype operating system that boots on a laptop. | Fable 5.2 designed three hardware devices built by manufacturing partner Diode; all three worked without electrical modifications. | 1,000 Fable agents formalized the existing proof of Fermat's Last Theorem in 30 hours, which is verification of a known proof rather than a new discovery. | Mythos 5.2 is restricted to vetted organizations for cybersecurity and sensitive biological research; Fable 5.2 is broadly available with restrictions.
rundown: On coding, Anthropic says Fable 5.2 at Xhigh effort achieved the highest score among released models it evaluated on FrontierCode 2.0. Medium effort stays the default in Claude apps and Claude Code. In the operating-system experiment, the model started from an empty folder and handled coding, testing and code reviews through its subagents, producing a kernel, disk and network drivers, a graphical interface, a login screen and an installer.

In science, Anthropic says Fable 5.2 completed calculations on two open problems involving black holes and quantum gravity and linked the results to research preprints so researchers can examine them. The Fermat's Last Theorem formalization translated an existing proof into a computer-checkable format, which the article says could cut the time mathematicians spend checking difficult arguments.

Fable 5.2 is available through Anthropic's platforms and AWS, Google Cloud and Microsoft Azure. An optional fast mode runs up to 2.5 times faster at twice the token prices. Anthropic says external organizations including the UK AI Security Institute and METR evaluated the models, and its internal findings suggest reduced rates of several unwanted behaviors.
sources:
- journalism | TechStartups.com | https://techstartups.com/2026/11/10/anthropic-launches-claude-fable-5-2-and-mythos-5-2-its-most-advanced-ai-models-for-coding-science-and-cybersecurity/ | 2026-11-10
prev: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
SHA-256 hash
101fbc24ce64222c6e215334ff00a8fc0ee0398da6e202ad0a62dc1226fa6c53
Previous version’s hash
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Check this record hasn’t been altered
How to check it yourself, without trusting this page

Download any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-2466 and hash its canonical field yourself, for example with shasum -a 256. You should get its content_hash. Each version’s text also ends with prev:and the hash of the version before it (version 1 points to 64 zeros). If anyone had changed a single character of any version after it was saved, those hashes wouldn’t line up.