50/100

Moderate evidence

ProblemPublished recordLaborProblem Space

Artificial intelligence (AI) adoption and Chinese art teachers' career exploration behavior: The roles of job substitution risks, job insecurity, and organizational AI readiness

Truvace record
TRV-2026-2463raw data (JSON)
Version
v1Published
First published
Evidence type
Survey
Sources
1 sourcePeer-reviewed
sha256
929d4364640f…check it

The increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in art education raises questions about teachers' professional security and career development. Drawing primarily on Conservation of Resources (COR) theory and, in a complementary manner, on Career Construction Theory (CCT), this cross-sectional study examined associations among AI adoption, perceived job substitution risk, job insecurity, career exploration behavior, and organizational AI readiness. Survey data from 381 Chinese art teachers were analyzed using…

The problem

In a survey of 381 Chinese art teachers, heavier AI use was associated with greater perceived risk of being replaced (B = .40) and greater job insecurity (B = .37).

What this doesn’t fix

The cross-sectional, self-reported design cannot establish causal order, and reverse causality is possible. Recruitment through social contacts may have favored technologically engaged teachers, and exploration motives were not measured.

Sources

1 on file
  1. PLOS Onedoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0362478
    Peer-reviewed2026-11-06

Cite this record

v1

Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-2463, v1: “Artificial intelligence (AI) adoption and Chinese art teachers' career exploration behavior: The roles of job substitution risks, job insecurity, and organizational AI readiness.” Truvace, 2026-11-11. /record/TRV-2026-2463 (accessed on the day you copy it). sha256 929d4364640f99e2…

Change history

1 version

Every change made to this record since it was first published, and why. Nothing has changed since it went up.

  1. Publishedv1929d4364640f…

    Certified into the record

Check this record hasn’t been altered

Check this record hasn’t been altered
How to check it yourself, without trusting this page

Download any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-2463 and hash its canonical field yourself, for example with shasum -a 256. You should get its content_hash. Each version’s text also ends with prev:and the hash of the version before it (version 1 points to 64 zeros). If anyone had changed a single character of any version after it was saved, those hashes wouldn’t line up.