37/100

Emerging evidence

Published recordEducationThe Trace (a gain and a problem)

Toward Human-Centered Pedagogy in the Age of Generative AI Among Higher Education Educators: Qualitative Phenomenological Study

Truvace record
TRV-2026-2457raw data (JSON)
Version
v1Published
First published
Evidence type
Interviews or qualitative study
Sources
1 sourcePeer-reviewed
sha256
fbe3b445aa23…check it

Background Generative AI (GenAI) expands possibilities for content generation, feedback, personalization, and instructional support in higher education. Its growing use also challenges established assumptions about teaching, assessment, professional expertise, academic integrity, and educational responsibility. Although research has examined technology adoption and AI competencies, less is known about how educators experience and interpret the pedagogical transformation associated with GenAI in everyday teaching…

45Gain side

How the two sides scoreProblem scores higher

50Problem side

The gain

In interviews with 23 educators at 3 Palestinian universities, participants said generative AI offered creativity, personalization, flexibility and instructional support.

The problem

In interviews with 23 educators at 3 Palestinian universities, participants said generative AI risked student dependence, reduced intellectual effort and weaker human connection.

A fixed formula sets both scores from the evidence and its sources. Reader votes don’t move them.

What the scores mean

G is the gain side, out of 100. It goes up when the gain is specific, when it measurably helped people and when the sources behind it are strong.

P is the problem side, out of 100. It goes up when the problem is specific, when it measurably hurt people and when the sources behind it are strong.

What this doesn’t fix

The findings come from interviews with 23 educators at 3 Palestinian universities, so they capture educators' own accounts rather than measured effects on learning.

Sources

1 on file
  1. JMIR Medical Educationdoi:10.2196/105172
    Peer-reviewed2026-11-06

Cite this record

v1

Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-2457, v1: “Toward Human-Centered Pedagogy in the Age of Generative AI Among Higher Education Educators: Qualitative Phenomenological Study.” Truvace, 2026-11-10. /record/TRV-2026-2457 (accessed on the day you copy it). sha256 fbe3b445aa2370db…

Change history

1 version

Every change made to this record since it was first published, and why. Nothing has changed since it went up.

  1. Publishedv1fbe3b445aa23…

    Certified into the record

Check this record hasn’t been altered

Check this record hasn’t been altered
How to check it yourself, without trusting this page

Download any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-2457 and hash its canonical field yourself, for example with shasum -a 256. You should get its content_hash. Each version’s text also ends with prev:and the hash of the version before it (version 1 points to 64 zeros). If anyone had changed a single character of any version after it was saved, those hashes wouldn’t line up.