Certified into the record
The exact text we saved
This is the version exactly as it was saved, character for character. The SHA-256 hash below is a 64-character code worked out from that text. Run the same text through SHA-256 and you get the same code; change a single letter and the code comes out completely different. Each version also stores the previous version’s hash, which chains them together so no version can be swapped out quietly.
TRUVACE RECORD VERSION record: TRV-2026-2440 version: 1 kind: certified reason: Certified into the record timestamp: 2026-11-09T18:01:19.303513Z status: published lens: p_space sector: health headline: Revealed: Palantir lobbied minister to stretch AI tools’ reach to NHS GP records dek: Palantir lobbied a health minister to consider extending its AI technology into GP records, stretching its reach into the NHS in a way doctors fear could undermine trust with patients. The US company, co-founded by the Trump-supporting billionaire Peter Thiel, used a direct WhatsApp channel to argue that “the logic of joining up primary and secondary [care] data is unarguable” and said its software was “ideal” for the job. The push came in February this year despite GP data being expressly ruled out of scope of… gain_title: (none) problem_title: Messages released under freedom of information law show Palantir privately urged a health minister to extend its software to GP records that its £330m NHS England contract excludes, and doctors say this could damage patient trust. trace_subject: (none) gain_reading: (none) gain_evidence: (none) problem_reading: Messages released under freedom of information law show Palantir privately urged a health minister to extend its software to GP records that its £330m NHS England contract excludes, and doctors say this could damage patient trust. problem_evidence: in a way doctors fear could undermine trust with patients quick_read: Palantir lobbied the then health minister Zubir Ahmed in February 2026 to consider extending its AI software into GP records, according to WhatsApp messages obtained by the campaign group Foxglove under the Freedom of Information Act. GP data is expressly outside its existing £330m contract with NHS England to run the federated data platform. The messages span July 2025 to March 2026. Palantir told the minister that joining up primary and secondary care data was "unarguable" and urged him to get ahead of political opposition from doctors and Palantir critics. The government said three years ago that GP data would not be part of the national platform. The British Medical Association and the NHS Chief Data and Analytical Officers Network say the push goes beyond earlier ministerial statements and risks patient trust. Palantir says it is for government to decide how its software is rolled out. The Department of Health and Social Care declined to comment, and a review of the contract is ongoing. limitation: The Palantir executive's name is redacted in the released documents, though Palantir did not deny it was Mosley, and Palantir says it is for the government to decide how the software is rolled out. tag: Evidence-backed problem key_points: Foxglove obtained the WhatsApp logs under the Freedom of Information Act and shared them with the Guardian; they appear to be between Palantir UK boss Louis Mosley and the former health minister Zubir Ahmed. | Palantir said its Foundry software was "ideal" for GP data and could bring faster GP access, better management of frail patients and more preventative care. | GP data was ruled out of scope of the £330m federated data platform contract when the Conservative government announced it three years ago. | The BMA's council chair Tom Dolphin warned of "scope creep" that could undermine patient trust and the doctor-patient relationship. | Marc Farr of the NHS Chief Data and Analytical Officers Network said GP data would require legislative change. | Ministers are reportedly unlikely to end Palantir's NHS contract soon, and health secretary Yvette Cooper spoke of developing UK sovereign AI, which suggests a possible replacement when the contract reaches its next end point in 2029. | Labour peer Tom Watson, hired as a full-time Palantir lobbyist in September, reportedly wrote to Cooper urging her to keep the contract going. rundown: The lobbying began in July 2025 and continued to March 2026. In February, Palantir argued that "the logic of joining up primary and secondary [care] data is unarguable". It also said the platform would "maintain local control of data", and told the minister the platform was already delivering strong results that more ministerial sponsorship would speed up. The company says the platform has helped cut surgery waiting times and discharge delays. The documents show Palantir advising the minister that "the politics [of using GP data] is not straightforward", citing the previous government's ruling. It named the Green party leader Zack Polanski and Your Party, led by Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana, as likely critics who would "make hay" with the idea unless ministers got ahead of it. Foxglove's Donald Campbell said the messages show Palantir knew how sensitive the issue was and made its case privately through privileged access to government. Doctors' and patients' groups, including the BMA, have opposed integrating GP data because of a lack of trust in a company that also works for the Israeli military and US Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The story sits within a wider contract dispute. Two House of Commons committees wanted Palantir forced out as soon as spring, but the Financial Times reported ministers were unlikely to end the contract soon, partly because removal would be disruptive without an alternative lined up. Palantir said it has long argued that data sharing can improve the NHS while organisations keep full local control. sources: - journalism | The Guardian | https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/nov/09/revealed-palantir-lobbied-minister-to-stretch-ai-tools-reach-to-nhs-gp-records | 2026-11-09 prev: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
- SHA-256 hash
- 0253fa3934146280f3ec4b5fcf707667b0b401213662a6c92fe58ebf261f613a
- Previous version’s hash
- 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
How to check it yourself, without trusting this page
Download any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-2440 and hash its canonical field yourself, for example with shasum -a 256. You should get its content_hash. Each version’s text also ends with prev:and the hash of the version before it (version 1 points to 64 zeros). If anyone had changed a single character of any version after it was saved, those hashes wouldn’t line up.
ace