aceFrom Chaos to Consistency: A Human-Centered Framework for AI-supported Assessment at a Mission-Driven Liberal Arts College
This practitioner inquiry reports on a pilot at a small Catholic liberal arts college that used generative artificial intelligence (GenAI)-supported tools to help faculty complete program-assessment documentation during a structured Education Day. Grounded in Catholic social teaching and human-centered AI principles, the pilot tested a framework organized around human judgment, ethical stewardship, and formative human-AI partnership. Survey results from the pilot cohort (N = 10; item-level valid responses varied…
In a pilot of ten faculty, AI-supported tools used within a human-judgment framework deepened thinking about evidence of student learning and won unanimous intent to keep using them.
The survey cohort was only ten faculty and item-level valid responses varied, so the endorsement reflects a very small, single-institution sample.
Evidence
- Peer-reviewedIntersection: A Journal at the Intersection of Assessment and Learning2026-10-19
How should this claim be treated?
Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-1890, v1: “From Chaos to Consistency: A Human-Centered Framework for AI-supported Assessment at a Mission-Driven Liberal Arts College.” Truvace, 2026-10-19. /record/TRV-2026-1890 (accessed at citation time). sha256 0a4ed4e89643720c…
Calibration history
Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.
Certified into the record
How to verify without trusting this page
Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-1890 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.