aceBlinded professional ratings of artificial intelligence-generated and dietitian-designed meal plans
Objectives: Artificial intelligence-assisted systems increasingly produce personalized meal plans, but their value depends on whether clinicians judge those plans credible and usable. We evaluated complete plans from a constrained artificial intelligence-assisted pipeline under blinded professional review. Methods: In a cross-sectional exploratory web study, 54 eligible anonymous evaluator records from Brazilian dietitians contributed 130 evaluations of five matched plan pairs, with one pipeline-generated and on…
In blinded review by Brazilian dietitians, meal plans from a constrained AI-assisted pipeline scored higher on average than matched dietitian-designed plans, mainly on nutritional adequacy and technical quality.
The study was exploratory, and the pair-level pattern was only descriptive because evaluator records overlapped across pairs; it rated plans and did not measure patient outcomes.
Evidence
- Peer-reviewedNutrition2026-10-16
How should this claim be treated?
Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-1886, v1: “Blinded professional ratings of artificial intelligence-generated and dietitian-designed meal plans.” Truvace, 2026-10-19. /record/TRV-2026-1886 (accessed at citation time). sha256 eb385b4a1ba57bca…
Calibration history
Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.
Certified into the record
How to verify without trusting this page
Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-1886 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.