TRV-2026-1778Version 1 · Certified

Written 2026-10-18 01:11:01 UTC · current record

Reason for this version

Certified into the record

Canonical text (the exact bytes fingerprinted)

TRUVACE RECORD VERSION
record: TRV-2026-1778
version: 1
kind: certified
reason: Certified into the record
timestamp: 2026-10-18T01:11:01.146532Z
status: published
lens: p_space
sector: health
headline: Measuring Knee Alignment Following Distal Femur Fracture Surgery: A Novel Deep Learning Approach
dek: Objectives To evaluate whether a machine learning-based system can accurately measure coronal knee alignment parameters from routine postoperative radiographs following surgical fixation of distal femur fractures. Methods Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting Single-center academic orthopedic trauma practice. Patient selection criteria Adult patients 50 years of age or older who underwent surgical fixation of low-energy OTA/AO 33A and 33C distal femur fractures (including periprosthetic fractures) between…
gain_title: (none)
problem_title: Measuring Knee Alignment Following Distal Femur Fracture Surgery: A Novel Deep Learning Approach: Pearson correlation coefficients ranged from 0.4 to 1.0, and Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated minimal systematic bias, with 95% of differences falling within a clinically acceptable range of ±5°.
trace_subject: (none)
gain_reading: (none)
gain_evidence: (none)
problem_reading: Measuring Knee Alignment Following Distal Femur Fracture Surgery: A Novel Deep Learning Approach: Pearson correlation coefficients ranged from 0.4 to 1.0, and Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated minimal systematic bias, with 95% of differences falling within a clinically acceptable range of ±5°.
problem_evidence: (none)
quick_read: Objectives To evaluate whether a machine learning-based system can accurately measure coronal knee alignment parameters from routine postoperative radiographs following surgical fixation of distal femur fractures. Methods Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Outcome measures and comparisons A machine learning-based automated alignment assessment system was trained to identify standard radiographic landmarks, including the femoral intercondylar notch, femoral condyles, tibial spines, and tibial plateaus, and automatically calculate commonly used coronal alignment parameters including joint line convergence angle (JLCA), anatomic femorotibial angle (aFTA), anatomic lateral distal femoral angle (aLDFA), and anatomic medial proximal tibial angle (aMPTA). The cohort was 78.0% female with a mean age of 72.3 years (range: 50 to 97 years).
limitation: 
tag: Evidence-backed problem
key_points: Objectives To evaluate whether a machine learning-based system can accurately measure coronal knee alignment parameters from routine postoperative radiographs following surgical fixation of distal femur fractures. | Methods Design: Retrospective cohort study. | Setting Single-center academic orthopedic trauma practice.
rundown: Objectives To evaluate whether a machine learning-based system can accurately measure coronal knee alignment parameters from routine postoperative radiographs following surgical fixation of distal femur fractures. Methods Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting Single-center academic orthopedic trauma practice. Patient selection criteria Adult patients 50 years of age or older who underwent surgical fixation of low-energy OTA/AO 33A and 33C distal femur fractures (including periprosthetic fractures) between November 2020 and December 2024 were retrospectively identified.
sources:
- peer_reviewed | Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma | https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000003300 | 2026-10-07
prev: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
sha256
637a24a2fb7aced643f00c1b262d5ac8dd336351fe8ce730990e25a8829eaf0e
previous
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page

Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-1778 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.