TRV-2026-1770Certified recordPeer-reviewed

Diagnostic Performance of Deep Learning Models for Ocular Toxoplasmosis Using Fundus Photography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background Ocular toxoplasmosis (OT) is the leading infectious cause of posterior uveitis worldwide, yet diagnosis remains challenging without a universal gold standard. Although deep learning (DL) shows significant promise for automated image analysis, a rigorous synthesis of its diagnostic accuracy across heterogeneous architectures and datasets is lacking. Methods Following PRISMA-DTA and CLAIM-AI guidelines, we searched major databases through January 2026 for studies evaluating DL models for OT detection us…

Health · The Trace — both readings · certified 2026-10-18 · v1 · article view · machine-readable

Current reading — gain

Across nine meta-analyzed studies, deep learning models detected ocular toxoplasmosis on fundus photographs with high pooled sensitivity and specificity.

Current reading — problem

Most included studies used one Paraguayan dataset and lacked multicentric external validation, which limits how far the accuracy can be generalized to other populations.

What this doesn’t fix

Most included studies used a single Paraguayan dataset, with high heterogeneity and no multicentric external validation, so global generalizability is uncertain.

Evidence

Reader signal

How should this claim be treated?

Cite this record

Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-1770, v1: “Diagnostic Performance of Deep Learning Models for Ocular Toxoplasmosis Using Fundus Photography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Truvace, 2026-10-18. /record/TRV-2026-1770 (accessed at citation time). sha256 4d6c050f7d84281f…

Calibration history

Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.

  1. Certifiedv14d6c050f7d84…

    Certified into the record

Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page

Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-1770 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.