TRV-2026-1722Version 1 · Certified

Written 2026-10-17 18:13:14 UTC · current record

Reason for this version

Certified into the record

Canonical text (the exact bytes fingerprinted)

TRUVACE RECORD VERSION
record: TRV-2026-1722
version: 1
kind: certified
reason: Certified into the record
timestamp: 2026-10-17T18:13:14.779593Z
status: published
lens: p_space
sector: health
headline: Identification of adventitious lung sounds in children with respiratory illnesses in Bangladesh using artificial intelligence and digital auscultation
dek: Integrated management of childhood illness (IMCI) guidelines have high sensitivity but low specificity for pneumonia diagnosis. Artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled digital stethoscopes capable of analysing lung sounds may improve IMCI diagnostic performance. We evaluated the performance of an AI algorithm trained to identify normal and adventitious lung sounds in children. Non-physician health workers recorded lung sounds from four chest positions using a digital stethoscope in under-five-year-old children with…
gain_title: (none)
problem_title: Against a paediatrician panel, the AI algorithm detected abnormal lung sounds in under-five children with only about 62% sensitivity and 61% specificity, which limits its current usefulness for pneumonia diagnosis.
trace_subject: (none)
gain_reading: (none)
gain_evidence: (none)
problem_reading: Against a paediatrician panel, the AI algorithm detected abnormal lung sounds in under-five children with only about 62% sensitivity and 61% specificity, which limits its current usefulness for pneumonia diagnosis.
problem_evidence: the AI algorithm’s sensitivity and specificity for detecting abnormal sounds were 61.8% and 60.7% among all children | the AI algorithm achieved moderate classification performance
quick_read: Researchers tested an AI algorithm that labels recordings from a digital stethoscope as normal or abnormal (crackles and/or wheeze). Non-physician health workers collected the recordings from four chest positions in under-five children with suspected pneumonia at community clinics in Bangladesh, and a paediatrician listening panel provided the reference classifications.

The work matters because standard childhood illness guidelines are sensitive but not specific for pneumonia, so better tools could in principle cut misdiagnosis. The algorithm's moderate performance means it is not yet a reliable fix, and it still needs further training to recognise recordings that cannot be interpreted.
limitation: The algorithm only achieved moderate performance and could not categorise recordings as uninterpretable, so it needs more training before it could reliably support diagnosis.
tag: Evidence-backed problem
key_points: Of 990 enrolled children, 867 (87.6%) had at least three interpretable chest position recordings and were analysed. | Among all children, the algorithm's sensitivity and specificity for abnormal sounds were 61.8% and 60.7%. | In children meeting IMCI pneumonia criteria, sensitivity was 63.5% and specificity was 66.8%. | The algorithm did not have an uninterpretable category, which the authors say needs further training.
rundown: The study responds to a known weakness in integrated management of childhood illness guidelines, which have high sensitivity but low specificity for pneumonia. The authors suggest AI-enabled digital stethoscopes might improve diagnostic performance.

Recordings were gathered by non-physician health workers using a digital stethoscope at community clinics. A trained paediatrician panel labelled each chest position as normal, abnormal, or uninterpretable, and the AI labelled the same recordings except for the uninterpretable category.

Comparisons were made at the child level and covered interpretable, uninterpretable, and high- and low-confidence recordings. The reported accuracy, about 61-67% for sensitivity and specificity, was described as moderate.
sources:
- peer_reviewed | Scientific Reports | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-76222-4 | 2026-10-16
prev: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
sha256
ec7d7c5da7ede2756b6ed2f5a8037f18c7448752d40b77c65fbe8fe95835ae38
previous
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page

Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-1722 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.