TRV-2026-1673Certified recordPeer-reviewed

AI-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems for Secondary Caries Detection and Staging on Bitewings: A Multi-Algorithm Comparison

Introduction Radiographic detection of caries lesions adjacent to restorations is challenging because of the limitations of two-dimensional imaging and difficulties distinguishing true lesions from restorative or anatomical radiolucencies. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) have been introduced to assist radiographic interpretation; however, different AI tools may yield variable diagnostic outputs, and their comparative performance remains unclear. Objective To compare t…

Health · Problem Space — documented harm · certified 2026-10-17 · v1 · article view · machine-readable

Current reading — problem

Across eight commercial and experimental AI systems, sensitivity for secondary caries on bitewings was only moderate, so many lesions, especially dentin-stage ones, went undetected.

What this doesn’t fix

The study found that missed lesions were common, and that errors were tied to overlap, restoration-related radiolucencies and cervical artifacts. The authors say better dataset diversity and reference-standard quality are still needed.

Evidence

Reader signal

How should this claim be treated?

Cite this record

Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-1673, v1: “AI-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems for Secondary Caries Detection and Staging on Bitewings: A Multi-Algorithm Comparison.” Truvace, 2026-10-17. /record/TRV-2026-1673 (accessed at citation time). sha256 8766fd3a19ed223e…

Calibration history

Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.

  1. Certifiedv18766fd3a19ed…

    Certified into the record

Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page

Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-1673 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.