TRV-2026-1635Version 1 · Certified

Written 2026-10-17 01:09:14 UTC · current record

Reason for this version

Certified into the record

Canonical text (the exact bytes fingerprinted)

TRUVACE RECORD VERSION
record: TRV-2026-1635
version: 1
kind: certified
reason: Certified into the record
timestamp: 2026-10-17T01:09:14.859058Z
status: published
lens: p_space
sector: labor
headline: The Importance of Electronic Communication in the Use of Artificial Intelligence Programs and Applications in the Field of Smart Agriculture from the Point of View of Agricultural Extension Workers in Nineveh Governorate, Iraq
dek: The study aimed to identify the level of importance of electronic communication among agricultural extension workers in using artificial intelligence (AI) programs and applications in the field of smart agriculture. It also aimed to identify the most frequently used electronic communication means by extension workers in employing AI programs and applications and rank them according to their relative importance; measure the contribution of electronic communication to improving extension workers' efficiency in usi…
gain_title: (none)
problem_title: Workers named poor fit between some AI applications and the needs of local extension work as the most important obstacle to using them.
trace_subject: (none)
gain_reading: (none)
gain_evidence: (none)
problem_reading: Workers named poor fit between some AI applications and the needs of local extension work as the most important obstacle to using them.
problem_evidence: Poor compatibility of some AI applications with the nature and needs of agricultural extension work in Nineveh Governorate
quick_read: A questionnaire study of agricultural extension workers in Nineveh Governorate, Iraq, examined how electronic communication relates to their use of AI programs and applications in smart agriculture. A random sample of 128 of the 256 extension workers answered the survey, which was analyzed with SPSS.

The findings suggest digital communication channels can help extension staff adopt AI tools, but the tools themselves may not match local extension needs. The results reflect workers' self-reported views, and the obstacles are flagged as a topic for further study.
limitation: The findings rest on extension workers' own questionnaire responses, and the authors say the obstacles to using AI applications in extension work still need further investigation.
tag: Evidence-backed problem
key_points: The importance of electronic communication for using AI in smart agriculture was rated moderate leaning high, at 48%. | Using agricultural institutions' electronic platforms to get information on AI programs ranked first, with a mean of 4.34. | Electronic communication's contribution to extension workers' efficiency with AI tools was rated high, at 46%. | Differences by educational qualification, years of service, Internet use level, and willingness to use social networking sites were significant; gender and training courses showed none.
rundown: The study population was the 256 extension workers of the Nineveh Directorate of Agriculture across its 32 agricultural divisions. A five-part questionnaire covered personal information, the importance of electronic communication, the means used, the efficiency contribution, and 15 obstacle items. Its reliability reached a Cronbach's alpha of 0.95.

The study tested whether importance scores differed by gender, educational qualification, years of service, training courses, level of Internet use, and willingness to use social networking sites. Gender and training courses made no significant difference. The other four variables did.

The main recommendation was that the Ministry of Agriculture establish or develop official agricultural electronic platforms affiliated with extension institutions, containing updated information on AI applications and their use across agricultural fields.
sources:
- peer_reviewed | International Journal of Environmental & Agriculture Research | https://doi.org/10.25125/ijoear-oct-2026-3 | 2026-10-15
prev: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
sha256
64dbdb338e2e8185e5a327ae7feae70430030ef31e6093a0114180d4647fdb52
previous
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page

Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-1635 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.