TRV-2026-1593Certified recordPeer-reviewed

Novel Approaches to Language Assessment Part 1: Artificial Intelligence-Automated Scoring of a Sentence Recall Task for School-Age Children

Purpose Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies have the potential to enhance the delivery of speech-language pathology services. One area of practice that could benefit from AI is automated screenings for developmental language disorder (DLD) in early elementary students. This report presents the elements and processes involved in evaluating an AI-based automated scoring system using archival recordings. Method A total of 947 audio samples of children completing the Redmond Sentence Recall (RSR) task, represe…

Health · Good Space — documented gain · certified 2026-10-16 · v1 · article view · machine-readable

Current reading — gain

An AI scoring pipeline for the Redmond Sentence Recall task matched the reference standard more closely than human-scored protocols and showed sensitivity of .768 to .873 for identifying DLD.

What this doesn’t fix

The system showed some mismatches with human evaluators and tended to produce lower scores, and the reference-standard comparison covered only a 130-child subset of the 947 samples.

Evidence

Reader signal

How should this claim be treated?

Cite this record

Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-1593, v1: “Novel Approaches to Language Assessment Part 1: Artificial Intelligence-Automated Scoring of a Sentence Recall Task for School-Age Children.” Truvace, 2026-10-16. /record/TRV-2026-1593 (accessed at citation time). sha256 d6c3a3fd06145b45…

Calibration history

Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.

  1. Certifiedv1d6c3a3fd0614…

    Certified into the record

Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page

Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-1593 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.