TRV-2026-1547Certified recordPeer-reviewed

Expert evaluation of ChatGPT-generated responses to patient questions in conventional and fast-track total knee arthroplasty

Background: Fast-track total knee arthroplasty (TKA) asks patients to understand early mobilization, early discharge, opioid-sparing analgesia, and selective use of drains and catheters. We evaluated expert-rated quality of ChatGPT responses to patient questions about these pathway-specific concepts alongside conventional TKA questions. Materials and methods: In this cross-sectional evaluation, three arthroplasty surgeons independently scored responses to 50 conventional TKA and 20 investigator-developed fast-tr…

Health · Good Space — documented gain · certified 2026-10-16 · v1 · article view · machine-readable

Current reading — gain

Three arthroplasty surgeons rated ChatGPT's answers to patient questions about knee replacement, including fast-track pathway concepts, at or near the top of the scale for accuracy, completeness, safety and readability.

What this doesn’t fix

The data do not establish equivalence between question sets: the sets were selected differently, scores clustered at the maximum, and the fast-track ratings need source-data verification.

Evidence

Reader signal

How should this claim be treated?

Cite this record

Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-1547, v1: “Expert evaluation of ChatGPT-generated responses to patient questions in conventional and fast-track total knee arthroplasty.” Truvace, 2026-10-16. /record/TRV-2026-1547 (accessed at citation time). sha256 0ce0e674d4d7b579…

Calibration history

Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.

  1. Certifiedv10ce0e674d4d7…

    Certified into the record

Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page

Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-1547 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.