TRV-2026-1441Certified recordPeer-reviewed

Cost-Effectiveness of AI in Breast Cancer Screening and Lung Cancer Diagnostics: A Case Study From Costa Rica

Objectives This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into breast and lung cancer diagnostic workflows in Costa Rica, addressing the scarcity of health economic evidence for AI adoption in low- and middle-income countries and focusing on context-specific systemic barriers. Methods Two state-transition Markov models compared AI-assisted workflows (AI as a first reader) with conventional radiologist-only strategies over a 10-year horizon. AI-supported mammography screen…

Health · Good Space — documented gain · certified 2026-10-15 · v1 · article view · machine-readable

Current reading — gain

In Markov models for Costa Rica, using AI as a first reader in breast screening and lung cancer diagnosis was projected to lower costs while increasing quality-adjusted life-years over 10 years.

What this doesn’t fix

The findings come from simulation models over a 10-year horizon, with the authors noting AI's impact is context-dependent and tied to system barriers and implementation realities, so results are not measured outcomes from actual deployment.

Evidence

Reader signal

How should this claim be treated?

Cite this record

Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-1441, v1: “Cost-Effectiveness of AI in Breast Cancer Screening and Lung Cancer Diagnostics: A Case Study From Costa Rica.” Truvace, 2026-10-15. /record/TRV-2026-1441 (accessed at citation time). sha256 534249dea214fd2b…

Calibration history

Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.

  1. Certifiedv1534249dea214…

    Certified into the record

Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page

Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-1441 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.