TRV-2026-1415Certified recordPeer-reviewed

Reference Hallucination in AI-Assisted Restorative Dentistry Education: An Educational Risk Assessment Using the Reference Hallucination Score Framework

Purpose: Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots are increasingly used by dental students and faculty for literature review, coursework preparation, and scholarly writing. In restorative dentistry education, where evidence-based decision-making is fundamental, inaccurate AI-generated citations may pose educational risks. This study evaluated the bibliographic reliability of AI-generated references in restorative dentistry topics and examined their potential implications for dental education. Methods: Five large la…

Education · Problem Space — documented harm · certified 2026-10-15 · v1 · article view · machine-readable

Current reading — problem

AI chatbots produced inaccurate bibliographic references on restorative dentistry topics, which can undermine evidence-based learning and academic integrity among dental students and faculty.

What this doesn’t fix

The study tested only five chatbots on ten standardised restorative dentistry prompts, and the authors describe the educational risks as potential rather than measured outcomes.

Evidence

Reader signal

How should this claim be treated?

Cite this record

Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-1415, v1: “Reference Hallucination in AI-Assisted Restorative Dentistry Education: An Educational Risk Assessment Using the Reference Hallucination Score Framework.” Truvace, 2026-10-15. /record/TRV-2026-1415 (accessed at citation time). sha256 ce713099bd7557bd…

Calibration history

Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.

  1. Certifiedv1ce713099bd75…

    Certified into the record

Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page

Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-1415 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.