aceArtificial intelligence and disability in the workplace: A systematic review of ethical issues
BackgroundThe use of artificial intelligence (AI) in workplace disability contexts is expanding, raising important ethical concerns. Existing frameworks, such as the OECD Framework for the Classification of AI Systems, provide structure for understanding AI applications but lack an explicit focus on ethics in relation to disability.ObjectiveThis systematic review examines ethical issues arising from the use of AI for employees with disabilities and aims to interpret the OECD framework through an explicit ethics…
Across 23 reviewed studies, workplace AI raises recurring ethical risks for employees with disabilities, including bias, privacy and consent problems, discrimination, and weak governance.
The abstract describes ethical risks as context-dependent and presents the review as a synthesis of current evidence. It does not report how well the recommended safeguards perform in practice.
Evidence
- Peer-reviewedWORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation2026-10-13
How should this claim be treated?
Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-1374, v1: “Artificial intelligence and disability in the workplace: A systematic review of ethical issues.” Truvace, 2026-10-14. /record/TRV-2026-1374 (accessed at citation time). sha256 28870ba1d003092b…
Calibration history
Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.
Certified into the record
How to verify without trusting this page
Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-1374 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.