TRV-2026-1312Certified recordPeer-reviewed

Exploring the Impact of Generative AI ChatGPT on Critical Thinking in Higher Education: Passive AI-Directed Use or Human–AI Supported Collaboration?

Generative AI is weaving into the fabric of many human aspects through its transformative power to mimic human-generated content. It is not a mere technology; it functions as a generative virtual assistant, raising concerns about its impact on cognition and critical thinking. This mixed-methods study investigates how GenAI ChatGPT affects critical thinking across cognitive presence (CP) phases. Forty students from a four-year university in the southwestern United States completed a survey; six provided their Cha…

Education · The Trace — both readings · certified 2026-10-08 · v1 · article view · machine-readable

Current reading — gain

When used with guidance in collaborative human-AI interaction, ChatGPT helped university students complete all four cognitive presence phases and enhanced critical thinking, with self-reported improvements in triggering, exploration, and integration.

Current reading — problem

When used in passive AI-directed mode, ChatGPT left students neutral at the resolution stage of cognitive presence, creating a resolution gap in critical thinking development.

What this doesn’t fix

Findings rest on a small, single-site sample and self-reported survey data, with only six scripts and two interviews, limiting generalizability beyond this context.

Evidence

Reader signal

How should this claim be treated?

Cite this record

Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-1312, v1: “Exploring the Impact of Generative AI ChatGPT on Critical Thinking in Higher Education: Passive AI-Directed Use or Human–AI Supported Collaboration?.” Truvace, 2026-10-08. /record/TRV-2026-1312 (accessed at citation time). sha256 5d54219da4c8f536…

Calibration history

Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.

  1. Certifiedv15d54219da4c8…

    Certified into the record

Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page

Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-1312 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.