TRV-2026-1186Certified recordPeer-reviewed

Artificial intelligence and perioperative nurses in error detection during operating room transfers: A simulation-based comparison

BackgroundThe safe and efficient transfer of patients to the operating room is a critical component of surgical care. The growing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare introduces new possibilities for enhancing clinical decision-making.ObjectiveThis study compared the performance of AI and perioperative nurses with varying experience levels in identifying errors during the preoperative patient transfer process.MethodsA controlled simulation study was conducted involving three nurses (novice,…

Health · Problem Space — documented harm · certified 2026-09-26 · v1 · article view · machine-readable

Current reading — problem

The growing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare introduces new possibilities for enhancing clinical decision-making.ObjectiveThis study compared the performance of AI and perioperative nurses with varying experience levels in identifying errors during the preoperative patient transfer process.MethodsA controlled simulation study was conducted involving three nurses (novice, intermediate, and expert) and a ChatGPT-4o AI model.

Evidence

Reader signal

How should this claim be treated?

Cite this record

Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-1186, v1: “Artificial intelligence and perioperative nurses in error detection during operating room transfers: A simulation-based comparison.” Truvace, 2026-09-26. /record/TRV-2026-1186 (accessed at citation time). sha256 ebbbcd5810d43aae…

Calibration history

Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.

  1. Certifiedv1ebbbcd5810d4…

    Certified into the record

Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page

Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-1186 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.