± EDUCATION Abstract This study aimed to explore the experiences, perceptions, knowledge, concerns, and intentions of Gen…− HEALTH Background Injuries are responsible for 950,000 deaths per year among children and adolescents under 18 years…− HEALTH Many problems in biomedicine can be posed as binary classification. When they are addressed using artificial…+ HEALTH Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of two general-use artificial intelligence…− HEALTH Early gastric cancer (EGC) is increasingly managed by endoscopic resection (ER); however, lymph node metastas…− LABOR Traditional secondary meta-analysis workflows are highly labour-intensive, time-consuming, and difficult to u…− HEALTH There is a growing literature on the prediction of risk of deterioration in hospital settings, including by l…− SCIENCE Self-driving cars increasingly rely on deep neural networks to achieve human-like driving 1-3 . The opacity o…
TruaceTracing the truth around AISaturday, September 5, 2026
Subscribe
TRV-2026-0988Certified recordPeer-reviewed

The AI generation gap: Are Gen Z students more interested in adopting generative AI such as ChatGPT in teaching and learning than their Gen X and millennial generation teachers?

Abstract This study aimed to explore the experiences, perceptions, knowledge, concerns, and intentions of Generation Z (Gen Z) students with Generation X (Gen X) and Generation Y (Gen Y) teachers regarding the use of generative AI (GenAI) in higher education. A sample of students and teachers were recruited to investigate the above using a survey consisting of both open and closed questions. The findings showed that Gen Z participants were generally optimistic about the potential benefits of GenAI, including enh…

Education · The Trace — both readings · certified 2026-09-05 · v1 · article view · machine-readable

Current reading — gain

Gen Z students in higher education reported optimism that generative AI could improve learning through enhanced productivity, efficiency and personalized learning and expressed intentions to use it for educational purposes.

Current reading — problem

Gen X and Gen Y teachers reported heightened concerns that student use of generative AI in higher education could lead to overreliance and create ethical and pedagogical problems without proper guidelines and policies.

Evidence

Reader signal

How should this claim be treated?

Cite this record

Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-0988, v1: “The AI generation gap: Are Gen Z students more interested in adopting generative AI such as ChatGPT in teaching and learning than their Gen X and millennial generation teachers?.” Truvace, 2026-09-05. /record/TRV-2026-0988 (accessed at citation time). sha256 66168b5059c4dc53…

Calibration history

Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.

  1. Certifiedv166168b5059c4…

    Certified into the record

Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page

Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-0988 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.