TRV-2026-0977Version 1 · Certified
Reason for this version
Certified into the record
Canonical text (the exact bytes fingerprinted)
TRUVACE RECORD VERSION record: TRV-2026-0977 version: 1 kind: certified reason: Certified into the record timestamp: 2026-09-04T06:04:41.859622Z status: published lens: p_space sector: health headline: A Real-World Evaluation of Large Language Model-Generated Hospital Courses in Pediatrics dek: Background Large language model (LLM)-generated hospital courses are increasingly integrated into electronic health records (EHRs), yet their accuracy and safety in pediatric populations remain poorly characterized. Objective To evaluate the accuracy, text quality, and perceived potential harm of EHR-integrated and LLM-generated hospital courses in pediatric inpatient care during early clinical implementation. Methods We conducted a descriptive evaluation from June 10 to August 8, 2025, at an academic freestandi… gain_title: (none) problem_title: Objective To evaluate the accuracy, text quality, and perceived potential harm of EHR-integrated and LLM-generated hospital courses in pediatric inpatient care during early clinical implementation. trace_subject: (none) gain_reading: (none) gain_evidence: (none) problem_reading: Objective To evaluate the accuracy, text quality, and perceived potential harm of EHR-integrated and LLM-generated hospital courses in pediatric inpatient care during early clinical implementation. problem_evidence: (none) quick_read: Background Large language model (LLM)-generated hospital courses are increasingly integrated into electronic health records (EHRs), yet their accuracy and safety in pediatric populations remain poorly characterized. Objective To evaluate the accuracy, text quality, and perceived potential harm of EHR-integrated and LLM-generated hospital courses in pediatric inpatient care during early clinical implementation. Methods We conducted a descriptive evaluation from June 10 to August 8, 2025, at an academic freestanding children's hospital using an Epic EHR with an integrated LLM tool (GPT-4o and GPT-4.1). Clinicians across multiple roles, including attending physicians, residents, and advanced practice providers, reviewed LLM-generated hospital courses for their own patients. limitation: tag: Evidence-backed problem key_points: Objective To evaluate the accuracy, text quality, and perceived potential harm of EHR-integrated and LLM-generated hospital courses in pediatric inpatient care during early clinical implementation. | Methods We conducted a descriptive evaluation from June 10 to August 8, 2025, at an academic freestanding children's hospital using an Epic EHR with an integrated LLM tool (GPT-4o and GPT-4.1). | Clinicians across multiple roles, including attending physicians, residents, and advanced practice providers, reviewed LLM-generated hospital courses for their own patients. rundown: Background Large language model (LLM)-generated hospital courses are increasingly integrated into electronic health records (EHRs), yet their accuracy and safety in pediatric populations remain poorly characterized. Objective To evaluate the accuracy, text quality, and perceived potential harm of EHR-integrated and LLM-generated hospital courses in pediatric inpatient care during early clinical implementation. Methods We conducted a descriptive evaluation from June 10 to August 8, 2025, at an academic freestanding children's hospital using an Epic EHR with an integrated LLM tool (GPT-4o and GPT-4.1). Clinicians across multiple roles, including attending physicians, residents, and advanced practice providers, reviewed LLM-generated hospital courses for their own patients. sources: - peer_reviewed | Hospital Pediatrics | https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2026-009216 | 2026-09-03 prev: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
- sha256
- 55a344ced3fbdf0ac295e4a3dffaf48eaacaba289acf66f177d038660e757982
- previous
- 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page
Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-0977 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.
ace