aceMethodological Reporting Quality of Artificial Intelligence-Based Orthopedic Studies: A Literature Analysis
Objective We set out to examine how completely artificial intelligence (AI)-based orthopedic studies report their methods. Methods A PubMed search covering 2023-2025 was run with a predefined strategy. Screening of titles, abstracts and full texts left 280 eligible papers, and 200 of these were drawn at random for scoring. Each paper was rated against a six-item framework built from the TRIPOD-AI, STARD-AI and CONSORT-AI guidelines. Results Mean score across the 200 studies was 4.8±0.9. Twenty-eight percent reac…
Methodological Reporting Quality of Artificial Intelligence-Based Orthopedic Studies: A Literature Analysis: Work in this area would benefit from closer attention to generalizability, clinical relevance and the existing reporting guidelines.
Evidence
- Peer-reviewedMedeniyet Medical Journal2026-09-02
How should this claim be treated?
Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-0967, v1: “Methodological Reporting Quality of Artificial Intelligence-Based Orthopedic Studies: A Literature Analysis.” Truvace, 2026-09-03. /record/TRV-2026-0967 (accessed at citation time). sha256 0c752b1a6f78b10a…
Calibration history
Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.
Certified into the record
How to verify without trusting this page
Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-0967 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.