Multidisciplinary dental treatment planning by artificial intelligence: A comparative evaluation
Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare four AI software programs-ChatGPT-5, Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini (V 2.5), and OpenEvidence-in generating comprehensive dental treatment plans for minimally destructed and severely mutilated teeth using identical clinical inputs. Material and methods Ten anonymized clinical cases, each consisting of 1 intraoral photograph and 1 corresponding periapical radiograph, were independently submitted to each AI software program using a standardized prompt…
OpenEvidence and ChatGPT-5 demonstrated greater agreement with the expert reference standard, although clinically significant diagnostic errors were observed across all evaluated systems.
Evidence
- Peer-reviewedJournal of Prosthodontics2026-08-21
How should this claim be treated?
Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-0852, v1: “Multidisciplinary dental treatment planning by artificial intelligence: A comparative evaluation.” Truvace, 2026-08-23. /record/TRV-2026-0852 (accessed at citation time). sha256 832b88124e53c405…
Calibration history
Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.
Certified into the record
How to verify without trusting this page
Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-0852 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.
ace