TruaceTracing the truth around AIWednesday, August 26, 2026
TRV-2026-0848Version 1 · Certified

Written 2026-08-22 06:03:18 UTC · current record

Reason for this version

Certified into the record

Canonical text (the exact bytes fingerprinted)

TRUVACE RECORD VERSION
record: TRV-2026-0848
version: 1
kind: certified
reason: Certified into the record
timestamp: 2026-08-22T06:03:18.298649Z
status: published
lens: g_space
sector: health
headline: Radiological assessment of pulmonary vascularity in congenital heart disease: standardized clinician assessment versus deep learning-based prediction
dek: Background Assessment of pulmonary vascularity on chest radiographs (CXRs) in congenital heart disease (CHD) is limited by subjectivity, and existing criteria lack sufficient validation. Artificial intelligence-based deep learning model (DLM) analysis may improve accuracy. We developed and validated structured criteria and a DLM to evaluate pulmonary vascularity and compared it with conventional clinical interpretation. Methods A total of 400 deidentified CXRs from CHD patients with Fick-derived pulmonary-to-sys…
gain_title: Artificial intelligence-based deep learning model (DLM) analysis may improve accuracy. Results Intraclass correlation between Fick- and DLM-derived Qp:Qs was 0.782 (P 1.5: 90% specificity, 98% sensitivity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 98%; predicting Qp:Qs Conclusion Deep learning-based analysis of CXRs enables accurate evaluation of pulmonary vascularity and outperforms structured assessment by clinicians.
problem_title: (none)
trace_subject: (none)
gain_reading: Artificial intelligence-based deep learning model (DLM) analysis may improve accuracy. Results Intraclass correlation between Fick- and DLM-derived Qp:Qs was 0.782 (P 1.5: 90% specificity, 98% sensitivity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 98%; predicting Qp:Qs Conclusion Deep learning-based analysis of CXRs enables accurate evaluation of pulmonary vascularity and outperforms structured assessment by clinicians.
gain_evidence: (none)
problem_reading: (none)
problem_evidence: (none)
quick_read: Background Assessment of pulmonary vascularity on chest radiographs (CXRs) in congenital heart disease (CHD) is limited by subjectivity, and existing criteria lack sufficient validation. Artificial intelligence-based deep learning model (DLM) analysis may improve accuracy.

Results Intraclass correlation between Fick- and DLM-derived Qp:Qs was 0.782 (P 1.5: 90% specificity, 98% sensitivity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 98%; predicting Qp:Qs Conclusion Deep learning-based analysis of CXRs enables accurate evaluation of pulmonary vascularity and outperforms structured assessment by clinicians.
limitation: 
tag: Evidence-backed gain
key_points: Background Assessment of pulmonary vascularity on chest radiographs (CXRs) in congenital heart disease (CHD) is limited by subjectivity, and existing criteria lack sufficient validation. | Artificial intelligence-based deep learning model (DLM) analysis may improve accuracy. | We developed and validated structured criteria and a DLM to evaluate pulmonary vascularity and compared it with conventional clinical interpretation.
rundown: Background Assessment of pulmonary vascularity on chest radiographs (CXRs) in congenital heart disease (CHD) is limited by subjectivity, and existing criteria lack sufficient validation. Artificial intelligence-based deep learning model (DLM) analysis may improve accuracy.

We developed and validated structured criteria and a DLM to evaluate pulmonary vascularity and compared it with conventional clinical interpretation. Methods A total of 400 deidentified CXRs from CHD patients with Fick-derived pulmonary-to-systemic flow ratio (Qp:Qs) were evaluated by three experts and three trainees in pediatric cardiology and radiology using nine prespecified criteria.
sources:
- peer_reviewed | Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | https://doi.org/10.1186/s44348-026-00084-7 | 2026-08-21
prev: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
sha256
6cf66d9fbee45ac804ff5dfc5a55d40db1c0920f7f6b1b0625edae8d5175ca01
previous
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page

Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-0848 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.