TruaceTracing the truth around AIWednesday, August 26, 2026
TRV-2026-0817Certified recordPeer-reviewed

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning-based prediction of tuberculosis treatment failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a leading cause of infectious disease mortality worldwide, and treatment failure contributes to ongoing transmission, drug resistance, and poor clinical outcomes. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) approaches have attracted growing interest in predicting TB treatment outcomes, but the literature is heterogeneous and lacks a comprehensive synthesis. We systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase (January 2000-October 2025) for studies developing or validating AI…

Health · The Trace — both readings · certified 2026-08-18 · v1 · article view · machine-readable

Current reading — gain

Meta-analysis of 19 studies with 100,790 participants found AI/ML models achieved pooled discrimination of 0.836 for predicting tuberculosis treatment failure.

Current reading — problem

Most models lacked external validation, only one was low risk of bias, publication bias was detected, and performance dropped in HIV-positive populations, leaving models not ready for routine clinical implementation.

Evidence

Reader signal

How should this claim be treated?

Cite this record

Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-0817, v1: “Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning-based prediction of tuberculosis treatment failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.” Truvace, 2026-08-18. /record/TRV-2026-0817 (accessed at citation time). sha256 114c4d940cee07be

Calibration history

Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.

  1. Certifiedv1114c4d940cee

    Certified into the record

Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page

Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-0817 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.