± MEDIA & ARTS This study employs stylometry to investigate whether the creative writing styles of humans and large language…− MEDIA & ARTS With the rapid application of Generative AI technologies in image generation, style transfer, and creative as…± SCIENCE Using artificial intelligence to identify themes in interview data from a quality improvement program evaluat…+ HEALTH The accurate and rapid identification of bacterial pathogens is essential in clinical setups and medical biod…± HEALTH Introduction Transparency has emerged as a foundational condition for trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (AI…± HEALTH Background Global developmental delay (GDD) frequently precedes intellectual disability (ID), but no validate…− HEALTH Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are entering veterinary diagnostic laboratory service, but reported model…+ HEALTH Antimicrobial biocides play a crucial role in infection control. Although traditional detection methods are a…
TruaceTracing the truth around AITuesday, August 25, 2026
Subscribe
TRV-2026-0808Certified recordPeer-reviewed

Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Education: A Scoping Review of Academic Perspectives

Aim To examine nursing academics' perceptions and experiences of artificial intelligence (AI) integration in nursing education. Design Scoping review. Data sources MEDLINE, CINAHL, ERIC, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched in August 2025. Methods A scoping review using Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. Peer-reviewed original research and reviews published in English (2019-2025) were included if they examined nursing educators' perspectives, attitudes, or experiences with AI in nursing education across un…

Education · The Trace — both readings · certified 2026-08-17 · v1 · article view · machine-readable

Current reading — gain

Nursing academics selectively use AI to improve academic productivity and research writing efficiency.

Current reading — problem

Despite belief AI will revolutionise nursing education, actual implementation remains conservative at augmentation level with none achieving transformative redefinition.

What this doesn’t fix

Review limited to English-language peer-reviewed research from 2019-2025 and 15 studies, with no transformative redefinition observed, indicating findings may not generalize beyond included contexts.

Evidence

Reader signal

How should this claim be treated?

Cite this record

Truvace Impact Record TRV-2026-0808, v1: “Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Education: A Scoping Review of Academic Perspectives.” Truvace, 2026-08-17. /record/TRV-2026-0808 (accessed at citation time). sha256 5e1b3be376b17d0b…

Calibration history

Every change to this record since certification, in the open. None yet — the reading has held since it entered the record.

  1. Certifiedv15e1b3be376b1…

    Certified into the record

Verify this record
How to verify without trusting this page

Fetch the canonical text of any version from /api/record/TRV-2026-0808 and hash it yourself — for example shasum -a 256 on the saved canonical field. The result must equal content_hash, and each version’s text ends with prev:followed by the prior version’s hash (version 1 chains to 64 zeros). If a single character of any version had been altered since certification, the chain would not reproduce.